G
greenandblue
Guest
who weighs more? which ever of you is heavier is the one who's gut i'll trust
My gut just goes off of what i have read.... i think his MOST important reason for choosing a school is that they offer him the ability to go on his mission. Pete Carrol has lied to players before with his promises, Charlie has not. BYU is a big possibility, im not positive but he might have a brother that already has pledged there JUCO style. All i know is ND is in the mix, and thats all i really care about.
Pete Carroll is far from a clean recruiter but I don't think he has ever lied to players at least not like Urban Meyer. He sure pays well though.
I'm pretty sure he told Stanley Havili he could take his mission when he was recruiting him and than changed his mind once he got on campus.
which should tell Manti something about Pete Caroll. If Caroll changed his position on taking missions during college, which as you say he was "adamant" about, because Manti said it would be a deal breaker, then Manti should see that Pete has no principles and is willing to do and say anything to get a recruit.
If there was a legitimate reason to not letting Havili go on his mission, then the same should hold true for Manti. Don't be surprised if Manti is discouraged from going on his mission if he ended up at USC.
That's a two-way street for any school he chooses, and is one of the reasons why letting a player go on a mission is so risky. Once the mission is over he is free to sign with any school he wants
the scholarship offers are renewed year to year.
For Te’o, mission is high on list of priorities
Aug 24, 2008 03:27 PM
By Brian McLaughlin
Sporting News
When it comes to the recruiting process, Manti Te’o is a bit unique. While academics and playing time are important—as they are with any football recruit—the Honolulu Punahou LB also wants to attend a school that is open-minded.
When it comes to the possibility that he may choose to go on a traditional two-year Mormon mission when he turns 19 years old, he wants to know if they would agree to it.
“I ask coaches, ‘If I want to go on my mission, would you support me?,” Te’o told Sporting News Today. “All of the schools that have offered have said it would be OK. Some of those programs that haven’t supported missions in the past have agreed to it.”
Te’o, a five-star prospect who is rated the No. 7 overall prospect in the nation by Rivals.com, will soon cut down his list of favorites from 32 scholarship offers to “around five”, he told SN Today.
He said he and his father will try to trim it down before September, when coaches can call more frequently. A coach’s response to his question about the mission, and the sincerity they’ve shown in the answer, could be the difference maker.
“I think some are (sincere), and some aren’t,” Te’o said. “Some have different intents, and right when I would get there they may try to persuade me otherwise.”
Good article....some of those schools that may change their mind when u get there like say USC backing out of saying it was okay to go on a mission, or LSU saying ur going to be a defensive lineman but when u get there they give u to the offensive line and say deal with it.
as has been stated in this thread, no school can tell him he can't go on his mission. What they CAN tell him is that his scholarship will not be saved for when he returns from the mission. A player of Manti's skill level will not have to worry about not having a scholarship to return to after his mission, i'm sure teams will be lining up for him post-mission.
Also your point about LSU, coaches pick what position a player will play and thats how it should be. Kids should not be dictating to coaches what and where they will play. If a coach tells a recruit he will be able to get a shot at DL and then puts him with the OL on his first day on campus then that is wrong. But if the aforementioned player can't cut it at the position he preferred, I can't fault the coach for putting the kid at a position that will best help the team succeed. Thats what happened with Joe Barksdale at LSU (the situation i believe you're referring to)