A week out, the post-screw job commentary has only confirmed what we already knew: the process is about money and not about ranking teams fairly, based on quality.
When someone (e.g., Greg McElroy) says that the committee doesn't want to drop CCG losers and create a disincentive to play CCGs, one wants to ask: who cares if there is a disincentive? Either the games count, or they don't. But if the goal is to pick the best teams, then we should be talking about the 21 point UGA/Bama game played the day before selection, not the 3 point ND/Miami game played more than three months earlier. Instead, the committee is rewatching the ND/Miami game, and the CCG doesn't count, at least for certain teams.
When someone (e.g., Joel Klatt) says the conferences want a committee because they can lobby it, it suggests we aren't trying to pick teams based on merit. Does anyone think lobbyists in Congress help members of Congress pick the "best" bills? Lol.
When some members of opposing fan bases say both that (1) we "deserved" to be left out because we aren't in a conference and keep any playoff earnings; but also (2) that we could have won, so it's good for [insert their team] that we aren't in, they admit that we would be in based on quality, but shouldn't be in for other reasons.
When a Pop-Tarts sponsor claims that Jim Phillips told him that the ACC would get a team in, and implied that if Duke beat UVA, ND would be out (and in the Pop-Tarts bowl), that suggests this was never really about Miami; it was about an ACC team being in.
Notice that none of these arguments in defense of what happened have anything to do with ND's quality as a team. Instead, each argument is about money. That is why ND opting out of the bowl game made sense: ND needed to fight back in way that these people understand. So long has we have this committee system, there will be a financial benefit to excluding ND, and we will be under-ranked relative to our quality. There must also be some financial cost associated with doing so. This is also why the entire system needs reform.