Politics

Politics

  • Obama

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • Romney

    Votes: 172 48.9%
  • Other

    Votes: 46 13.1%
  • a:3:{i:1637;a:5:{s:12:"polloptionid";i:1637;s:6:"nodeid";s:7:"2882145";s:5:"title";s:5:"Obama";s:5:"

    Votes: 130 36.9%

  • Total voters
    352

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,358
Reaction score
5,709
1) You're distorting. The numbers I posted reflected the American economy and American economic policy, not the global economy.

2) It's absolutely a guess. You and I have no clue what would have changed in our economy if Gore won in 2000 or Hillary won in 2016.

3) You're either missing my point or purposely changing topics. In one post you completely disregard polling on how Americans view Biden economic policy, then you tell us you know how Gore and Hillary would have performed had they won. And the vortex continues to vortex.

1) How is that distorting? Inflation is directly impacted by the global economy.

2) You've missed the point - entirely. I'm saying that in the 2000 election, people that called themselves a single issue voter for economics should have voted for Gore because of the success of Clinton. This is based on data from BEFORE the election. No guessing here.

3) I never made any guesses on how Gore or Hillary would have done, point out where I said that. I can't be any clearer - If a voter in the year 2000 or 2016 was a single issue economy voter they should have voted for Gore and Hillary PLEASE NOTE: I am not projecting any future results. Maybe you'll get it this time?

Awww, someone mistook you for gay, so sad. I can tell that triggered you and your lack of life skills.

Yes I am the one who lacks life skills sure thing buddy lol.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,587
Reaction score
20,038
Inflation is under 3%. Twice as good as you thought and improving. I assume you’d rather it was increasing instead of decreasing? Either that or it’s you who are disregarding economic data.
This is great. The problem is it's under 3% now, but It just means the high prices aren't accelerating as fast as they were. Inflation was higher causing it gas, food and other prices to go way up and there's no sign that they are going back down anytime soon.
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,518
Reaction score
17,384
This is great. The problem is it's under 3% now, but It just means the high prices aren't accelerating as fast as they were. Inflation was higher causing it gas, food and other prices to go way up and there's no sign that they are going back down anytime soon.

They're not going to ever go back down, not like they were. The people that get hurt the most are the lower class and lower middle class. Those people will have increased their income by little or nothing in the last few years while prices have increased greatly. They're not able to weather the storm, and we're going to see a lot of people go into debt by large margins.
 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
3,245
They're not going to ever go back down, not like they were. The people that get hurt the most are the lower class and lower middle class. Those people will have increased their income by little or nothing in the last few years while prices have increased greatly. They're not able to weather the storm, and we're going to see a lot of people go into debt by large margins.
I agree. Raise the minimum wage with inflation.
 

Polish Leppy 22

Well-known member
Messages
6,594
Reaction score
2,009
1) How is that distorting? Inflation is directly impacted by the global economy.

2) You've missed the point - entirely. I'm saying that in the 2000 election, people that called themselves a single issue voter for economics should have voted for Gore because of the success of Clinton. This is based on data from BEFORE the election. No guessing here.

3) I never made any guesses on how Gore or Hillary would have done, point out where I said that. I can't be any clearer - If a voter in the year 2000 or 2016 was a single issue economy voter they should have voted for Gore and Hillary PLEASE NOTE: I am not projecting any future results. Maybe you'll get it this time?



Yes I am the one who lacks life skills sure thing buddy lol.
1) We aren't talking about the global economy, atleast not in this discussion. We're talking about the US economy, and my original point was that the 40 year inflation highs (for your US history, that was under Jimmy Carter, a Democrat) and record breaking gas prices are directly tied to Biden's policies.

2) You say they should have. Guessing. Entirely speculative. I wonder how many voters in 2020 would still have gone Biden if they knew in 2021 gas would be $5/ gallon and a dozen eggs would be $5.

3) This is entirely opinion, and you're free to share it. It's not Gospel.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,587
Reaction score
20,038
They're not going to ever go back down, not like they were. The people that get hurt the most are the lower class and lower middle class. Those people will have increased their income by little or nothing in the last few years while prices have increased greatly. They're not able to weather the storm, and we're going to see a lot of people go into debt by large margins.
Just saw that credit card debt is at an all time high. Something like a trillion.
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,358
Reaction score
5,709
1) We aren't talking about the global economy, atleast not in this discussion. We're talking about the US economy, and my original point was that the 40 year inflation highs (for your US history, that was under Jimmy Carter, a Democrat) and record breaking gas prices are directly tied to Biden's policies.

2) You say they should have. Guessing. Entirely speculative. I wonder how many voters in 2020 would still have gone Biden if they knew in 2021 gas would be $5/ gallon and a dozen eggs would be $5.

3) This is entirely opinion, and you're free to share it. It's not Gospel.

1) How do you think prices are decided on? Where do the products come from that are sold in the stores? Unless you live in a hippie commune you are part of the global economy. Inflation rates in the 70s were incredibly high in every developed country as well lol To say Bidens policies are directly tied to inflation without hard evidence, well that's something.

2) Ok, so that's like saying "I like money" and when given the choice between 100 or 50 dollars that person takes 50 dollars. That person has demonstrated they do not value money. Just like any person that calls themselves fiscally conservative who votes against their claimed interest is not actually fiscally conservative. If you are fiscally conservative you should vote for the democrats because they are a historically centrist/conservative party who have had better economic policies.

Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,587
Reaction score
20,038
Even though they haven't said specifically what happened, it's apparent she had a stroke.
 

Blazers46

Adjectives: wise/brilliant/handsome.
Messages
8,107
Reaction score
5,459
Just saw that credit card debt is at an all time high. Something like a trillion.
But all we need to do is raise the min wage. 🙄

I have a job now where I am privy to salaries and credit reports of federal employees. It’s amazing how in debt employees are that have positions in places like the federal reserve making $150k and above. No matter what you pay people debt will find anyone these days.
 

Jiggafini19Deux

Minister of Delayed Gratification
Messages
13,483
Reaction score
14,206
F3FszsYXAAEQWTQ

Turnout comes to about 3.1 million. Their 2014 midterm was 3.15

Ballot measures in Florida, Missouri and Arizona next?
 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,105
Reaction score
12,943
What is Issue 1?
Essentially republicans wanted to sneak in a summer vote when they thought less people would be paying attention so they could change the rules because they know they are going to lose the abortion vote in Ohio.

I don’t really have a strong opinion on the abortion issue one way or the other, but that’s some bitch shit. Like a little kid that’s losing a game so they try to change the rules.
 

Blazers46

Adjectives: wise/brilliant/handsome.
Messages
8,107
Reaction score
5,459
Essentially republicans wanted to sneak in a summer vote when they thought less people would be paying attention so they could change the rules because they know they are going to lose the abortion vote in Ohio.

I don’t really have a strong opinion on the abortion issue one way or the other, but that’s some bitch shit. Like a little kid that’s losing a game so they try to change the rules.
Isn’t that just called politics in 2023?
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,518
Reaction score
17,384
Republicans rarely show up in numbers for special elections here. Ohio had half the total votes yesterday that they had in the 2020 election, and a number of suburbs look to have voted blue that were red for the presidential election. Ironic that they framed the issue as protecting Ohio from special interest groups sneaking changes into special elections, and they couldn't sneak their own in. I don't care for super majority required voting personally. Ohio remains slightly conservative leaning, but only by a slim margin. If they required a 60% vote for amendments I'm not sure much would get done, much like Washington.
 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,105
Reaction score
12,943
Republicans rarely show up in numbers for special elections here. Ohio had half the total votes yesterday that they had in the 2020 election, and a number of suburbs look to have voted blue that were red for the presidential election. Ironic that they framed the issue as protecting Ohio from special interest groups sneaking changes into special elections, and they couldn't sneak their own in. I don't care for super majority required voting personally. Ohio remains slightly conservative leaning, but only by a slim margin. If they required a 60% vote for amendments I'm not sure much would get done, much like Washington.
It's just funny to me that overturning Roe was framed as returning the issue to the states. Fine let's vote on it then.

"No no no! Not like that!!"
 

GoIrish41

Paterfamilius
Messages
9,929
Reaction score
2,120
Essentially republicans wanted to sneak in a summer vote when they thought less people would be paying attention so they could change the rules because they know they are going to lose the abortion vote in Ohio.

I don’t really have a strong opinion on the abortion issue one way or the other, but that’s some bitch shit. Like a little kid that’s losing a game so they try to change the rules.
The GOP is the “some bitch shit” party
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,518
Reaction score
17,384
Signs have all pointed to Ohio likely passing abortion protections and/or removing restrictions in November. Suffolk polls showed support even before Roe v Wade was overturned. Yesterday shouldn't have been a surprise to anyone. The question might be if there are any restrictions on said abortions. Currently they're legal up to 22 weeks.
 
Last edited:

Jiggafini19Deux

Minister of Delayed Gratification
Messages
13,483
Reaction score
14,206
Feinstein could be replaced now, but they'd have to replace her on the Judiciary Committee, and there is no way that gets done. Republicans will stall the shit out of that, so Democrats are going to play Weekend at Bernie's and prop Feinstein up for Judiciary votes.

It's stupid and dysfunctional, but that's Federal Government right now.
 

Polish Leppy 22

Well-known member
Messages
6,594
Reaction score
2,009
1) How do you think prices are decided on? Where do the products come from that are sold in the stores? Unless you live in a hippie commune you are part of the global economy. Inflation rates in the 70s were incredibly high in every developed country as well lol To say Bidens policies are directly tied to inflation without hard evidence, well that's something.

2) Ok, so that's like saying "I like money" and when given the choice between 100 or 50 dollars that person takes 50 dollars. That person has demonstrated they do not value money. Just like any person that calls themselves fiscally conservative who votes against their claimed interest is not actually fiscally conservative. If you are fiscally conservative you should vote for the democrats because they are a historically centrist/conservative party who have had better economic policies.

Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk
1) You're painting a picture as though the whole world is one big commune and every country has the same economic policy and same inflation rates. It's inaccurate, and you're smart enough to know it. Take 15 seconds and pull up inflation rates for every country in the past 2 years. The hard evidence is that our typical 2-3 percent inflation rate jumped to 8 PERCENT the same year Biden passed the $2 trillion "American Rescue Plan."

2) No, you're making this far more complicated than it is. If all Biden voters knew in 2020 what things would be like now, many wouldn't have voted for him. Current polls show us the majority of Americans disapprove of his economic policies.

3) Fiscal conservatives voted for Reagan because of the Carter disaster. Fiscal conservatives voted for Trump because of his economic plans (and because Hillary was a terrible candidate), and things were pretty strong in the US until Covid hit.
 
Top