I just saw this post and it frustrates me, so I figured I'd chime and offer my opinions on the matter.
I think that this would be a big mistake. This is not the year to trade up. This years draft is weak. BQ is a good QB. He is the the best QB coming out this year. But I don't see him as worth trading up for. He's not Carsion Palmer or Peyton Manning. Honestly, I see him having a Rick Mirer type career. If you recall, Mirer was the 2nd overall pick in the 93 draft but never made big strides as a pro.
What made Carson Palmer so much better coming out of college?
He had one incredible season, his senior year.
He played in a conference that is notorious for having lax defenses.
Is there something I am missing?
BQ has gaudy stats...a product of an easy schedule for 2 years and a good offensive scheme.
In your later posts you talk about BQ taking advantage of the system in college, well, what the hell was Palmer doing?
He had a great offensive system with Norm Chow. Chow's system was more than capable of producing another Heisman winning QB two years later.
Iguess his 50% completion percentage and 3 INTs just knocked your socks off, huh?
Did you even watch the game? Did you? While his performance was poor, it is easy to understand the performance. First INT can be attributed to a tip, which can hardly be blamed on Quinn. Next, when the team is up 21-7, what exactly will a coach do? If you guessed make up the defecit, you are right. Running the ball doesn't accomplish this, so Quinn must pass. What happens when the opposing team knows you are going to pass because you are so far down? I don't know, perhaps play a defense tailored to stop the pass. While his performance sucked, he didn't get much help either.
To address your opinion of BQ. This year we played 3 defenses that were statistically top 25 in yards allowed per game. Those teams were:
GT...We scored 14 point. BQ threw 0 TDs. He was 23/38 and 246 yds. 60% is a nice completion percentage. 246 yds is a pretty avg day. zero TDs is not good unless you are running for scores which we weren't (evident by the total points scored).
PSU...Excellent game. 25/36, 387 yds. 3 TDs. 41 points scored.
Michigan...24/48 (bad). 234 yds (mediocre) 3 TDs (very good) 3 INTs (awful). 1 TD pass to the wrong team (awful). 21 points (mediocre)
Basically, our offense couldn't generate points against 2 of the 3 good defenses they faced. And when you have an NFL calibre QB in the backfield, you expect to score on everyone. So against the good defenses, in my opinion, he underperformed. He certainly didn't look like a 1st round draft choice in those games.
Where to begin, where to begin.
Let's see, 246 yards is an average day? I'll take it as an average day myself. Especially considering we actually had some sort of running offense that game, running for 140 yards.
PSU, he played well. Not much more can be said.
Michigan, stats suck. How many rushing yards this game I wonder? If you said 4 you are right. I wonder whether they stopped rushing the ball when they got down? Gosh, I just don't know. Peyton Manning, Carson Palmer, or anyone else wouldn't have thrown much better when the defense knows they are going to throw.
When you have an NFL caliber QB you expect to score on everyone? On which game did we get shutout? You may have meant, you expect to beat everyone.
Well, what about Jay Cutler? Did Vanderbilt beat everyone? How were his stats? Look them up.
Just to save time:
59.1 % completion rate.
21 TD
9 INT
Rating: 126.07
Yard/G: 279.4
This is from the number 11 pick last draft. This was with the old clock rules. Somehow Cutler is a top 15 NFL draft pick with those stats, but who did he beat? No one. Look up his stats versus LSU: 51 QB rating, when was the last time you saw Quinn have a 51 QB rating? How about Cutler's performance versus the powerhouse Middle Tennessee State? A lowly 108 QB rating.
Cutler sure didn't look like a first round draft choice in those two games, but what do you know, somehow he got picked. I guess Cutler is the exception to your rule.