Kanye West
Yeezus
- Messages
- 1,037
- Reaction score
- 43
Read it again.Can you at least point to what you're referring to and make an argument against the opinion you apparently disagree with?
Considering the insult, your post is incredibly ironic.
Read it again.Can you at least point to what you're referring to and make an argument against the opinion you apparently disagree with?
Considering the insult, your post is incredibly ironic.
Read it again.
DD looked quite athletic on that TD. Especially hand fighting and dominating and running away from a 'next level' corner.
Dude, I know you know this, but that's exception-rule example.
You're still dumb sober.
I agree, you are drunk.
This thread is stupid. The defensive players are not slow. The DB's and LB's have been taking horrible angles and overpursuing.
You just might be the worst poster on this board. With the likes of IrishPat trolling hard, that should tell you something. Keep on keeping on with your solid input though.
You want somebody to say something? Fine. It was a ludicrous statement. Purdue took advantage of some mismatches with quick backs against big linebackers. I didn't notice the mismatches in the 2nd when Diaco adjusted by keeping smaller, quicker guys in the game. Your finger pointing at Luongo is really ignorant.
Based on.......?
Well, YOU are my primary source, having announced that you were drunk before starting this baseless thread. But certainly, you're obstinate cling to your assertion that it is the conditioning that keeps a 260 lb from keeping up with a scat-back seems to the confirm that either you are drunk or just a real dough-head. So I cut you some slack and blamed the alcohol.
The coaching staff having a slow paced vanilla offense and the D searching for an identity and leadership is Longo's fault.
So Longo is killing it in your opinion? And we're noticeably more athletic than almost every team we face in your opinion?
So it's OK to question the head coach and the coordinators, but questioning Longo is out of bounds?
You want somebody to say something? Fine. It was a ludicrous statement. Purdue took advantage of some mismatches with quick backs against big linebackers. I didn't notice the mismatches in the 2nd when Diaco adjusted by keeping smaller, quicker guys in the game.
It was in italics, kuehnja.
So it's OK to question the head coach and the coordinators, but questioning Longo is out of bounds?
In my opinion, Russell, Tuitt and Grace look too bulky. We didn't see a lot of Grace last season, but he looks nothing like the "athletic" "sideline-to-sideline" player that was often described.
Tuitt and Russell just don't seem as quick as they were last season. I think Longo is quite a ways down the list of problems, but it is a bit worrying how SLOW we look on the back end on defense.
I'm not looking for our S&C coach to turn 4.7 guys into 4.3 guys. That's impossible. But football is not a straight-line speed game. We just look slow to the quarterback and to the edge on defense, which is a combination of many things (speed, angles, pursuit, recognition, et al). But it is quite clear to me that we don't look as athletic as I'd hoped on the back end of the defense.
Right, but he was sarcastically saying it IS Longo's fault. Meaning he's mocking the idea that Longo might not be all that good.
Do you remember what it was like under Weis? The team looks like they are juiced compared to then. It is more of an X's and O's issue.
But must sarcasm be taken seriously, enough to warrant a response?
Yes because I wanted to make aware that if we can call out the head coach, the S/C coach is definitely fair game as well.