jiggafini19
The Pope
- Messages
- 7,370
- Reaction score
- 58
The first half was the flatest the team has played and looked all year and we're recalling memories of the great TW.
Ah, Notre Dame football is back.
Ah, Notre Dame football is back.
jiggafini19 said:I'm not sure what the hell everyone is so worried about.
A win in Palo Alto equals Fiesta Bowl. this is about money. It isn't about how much you beat Syracuse by or what your opponents have done. If they go 9-2, they're going to Arizona on New Year's Day.
Oregon and Ohio State aren't going to fill that stadium. Tostitos knows this.
The power of the potato chip compells thee.
BGIF, if your whole theme is that ND was awful I agree. The score looks like ND wiped them up but that is deceiving. If ND plays the way they are capable the score is 100 to something.BGIF said:I'm not sure which game you were watching. I was watch the #6 team in the nation, a 35 point favorite, look like a Ty Willingham coached ND team in the first half. I guess you missed the missed FG, blocked FG, dropped passes, misthrown passes, porous OLine, inability to adjust to a blitz with an empty backfield, fortuitous roll out of bounds of the Walker fumble, 0 for 7 on 3rd down conversions in the first half, 3.7 yds/rushing attempt, Quinn's 7.3 yds/attempt was the 2nd lowest of the season, his % Complete was 3rd worst, his QB Efficiency Rating 2nd lowest of the season, passing yds was 4th lowest of the season.
Thank goodness for Leo Ferrine.
BTW, Pollsters don't deduct the last 7 minutes of the game results because it's garbage time. They don't watch the whole game (thank goodness this week) but the count the entire score. Ask JOEPA, a few years ago he emptied the bench and the opponent put up to late scores and PSU dropped several slots in the Poll with a solid win. PSU didn't play near as sloppy as ND did today.
Fortunately the voters will only watch the highlights and will hear what I heard watching the highlights: "Quinn first 3,000 yd passer in ND History", "Quinn to Samardzija for a touchdown, how many times have we made that call this season?", "Samardzija and Stovall are the best receiving duo in ND history", "Samardzija and Stovall are the only pair of receivers on a team this season to each have 10 TDs", "Walker sets an ND rushing record with 6, 100 yd games'.
True statements all and representative of the season's efforts but not representative of the last game's effort. They won't see the inconsistency anyone without homer glasses saw, nor the inability to dominate Sagarin's 117th ranked team, but perhaps if they read the game stats they'll be impressed with ND's 35% 3rd down conversion rate, or ND's 2-5 success rate in the red zone.
It was a "W" but it was far from impressive. Ty's gone. Inconsistency insn't cherished anymore. One loss and other two loss teams have been jawing at trailing ND in the polls. The Syracuse game gave some of them an opportunity close the gap and move ahead.
bigdon said:BGIF, if your whole theme is that ND was awful I agree. The score looks like ND wiped them up but that is deceiving. If ND plays the way they are capable the score is 100 to something.
I just hope we don't carry this type of performance to Palo Alto or we will all be crying in our beer. ND will find out that Stanford is no Syracuse.
I'm not sure what the hell everyone is so worried about.
A win in Palo Alto equals Fiesta Bowl. this is about money. It isn't about how much you beat Syracuse by or what your opponents have done. If they go 9-2, they're going to Arizona on New Year's Day.
Oregon and Ohio State aren't going to fill that stadium. Tostitos knows this.
The power of the potato chip compells thee.