bmf175
Active member
- Messages
- 603
- Reaction score
- 40
guff said:To clear the record I was on the fence about the Ty firing. I felt the ND may have jumped the gun just to go after the hot commodity. I remember hearing Theisman on the Dan Patrick Show a day or two after the firing - Theisman was cautioning against Urban and was the first person I heard mention Weis. I found myself agreeing with him.
Now for some clarity on the gimmick. There are only two ways to make a lasting change in football 1. that change must be done in the NFL and work or 2. the change must be adopted by the NFL and work. All of previous innovations - forward pass, screen, motion etc. - were done in the absence of a premier pro league. Now the NFL is king and if it’s not good enough for the king then it dies. The ‘West Coast Offense’ and ‘Zone Blitz’ trickled down from the NFL. If in the coming years an NFL team implements the spread option, I’ll eat the appropriate the amount of crow
But that will never happen. No one in the NFL will even consider the spread option. If a coach did - to quote Jerry Glanville - NFL would stand for ‘Not For Long’ . The QB would get hammered. The team would need to carry six QBs just to complete the season.
How many non military academy D1 schools are running a traditional option? And of that number how many were successful. High school players want to believe that they can make it to the NFL and they know they can’t get there running the option. The option died with Tom Osbourne. And when Alex Smith, Chris Leak and those to follow tank in the NFL because they can’t simultaneously drop back and read a defense the spread option will die.
Very good observation.
The option is a potent SCHEME and can be very effective in high school and college. Defensive ends are to strong and too quick in the NFL for that to work, also with the whole attitude of quater backs being the key to the franchise nobody will risk their QB running the option in the NFL. And instead of playing against a good college team that has one stand out D end in the NFL you really have no "weak" (relatively speaking) side to run to.
There is nothing wrong with nickel and dimeing a team down the field. It keeps their offense off the field and keeps the T.O.P in your teams favor. But when it comes down to running a hurry up offense or no huddle, you have to change your option team into a passing team.
The QB might not be a great drop back passer with the appropriate arm stretch to get the ball to the side lines to stop the clock, that and he will not be as experienced in reading the secondary coverage.
I think that is why a lot of teams moved to more high power throwing offensive schemes which allow you to score quickly. Like the spread offense (purdue) or the shotgun ace formation which Miami is known for. (and even though they are a bunch of crooks (not cooks), they are known for their high powered offenses)
Last edited:

