Triple Option D (Lea)

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
Every year it seems we're discussing defending the triple option, and I'm googling like I do every year. This year, curious as to what Lea will employ. With Navy every year, and GT on our schedule twice over the next 3 years, figured I'd create a place to drop some articles relevant to rule changes, defenses, and what specifically Lea is doing. Let's hope Lea sticks around instead of playing musical DCs.

Will drop several articles, but the first is on the new rule changes on cut blocking.


https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2018/8/30/17472936/block-below-waist-rule-ncaa
Read college football’s rule on cut blocks, plus some tips on what’s allowed
Chop blocks, where teammates block a defender high and low, are always illegal. The rules around cut blocks are more complex.
By Alex Kirshner@alex_kirshner Aug 30, 2018, 10:00am EDT
SHARE


The rules surrounding blocks below the waist are some of the most complicated in college football.

Whether a block below the waist is legal depends on who’s doing it and where on the field. The stakes are significant, because some teams build cut blocks into their game plans. Plus, the penalty for an illegal block is 15 yards.

First, here’s the NCAA’s full rule dealing with blocks below the waist by the offense:
Linemen with initial position completely inside the tackle box [inside the alignment of the offensive tackles] may legally block below the waist inside the tackle box until the ball leaves the tackle box. All other Team A players are allowed to block below the waist only if the force of the initial contact is directed from the front. “Directed from the front” is defined as within the clock face region between “10 o’clock and 2 o’clock” forward of the area of concentration of the player being blocked.

Exceptions:

-Team A players may not block below the waist when the block occurs five yards or more beyond the neutral zone.

-Players outside the tackle box at the snap ,or any time after the snap, or in motion at the snap may not block below the waist toward the original position of the ball at the snap.


-Once the ball has left the tackle box, a player may not block below the waist toward his own end line.

Summing that up, for a block below the waist to be legal, it has to:
Come within five yards of the line of scrimmage
Be from the front, unless it’s by an interior lineman
Whether a block is “below the waist” hinges on where initial contact is made.
The NCAA’s definition:

A block below the waist is a block in which the force of the initial contact is below the waist of an opponent who has one or both feet on the ground. When in question, the contact is below the waist.

An important clarification:

A blocker who makes contact above the waist and then slides below the waist has not blocked below the waist.

Two parts of the cut-block rule are new for 2018:
If an offensive player blocks someone below the waist more than five yards beyond the line of scrimmage, it’s illegal.
Only interior linemen can block below the waist from the side. Everyone else’s blocks below the waist must come from the front. Previously, other offensive players were allowed to low-block from the side as long as they were inside the tackle box — the area about five yards in either direction from the snapper, and extending backward to the offense’s goal line.
Another thing: Offensive players can’t block below the waist in the direction of their own end line once the ball has left the tackle box. The prohibition on low blocks beyond five yards should take care of that anyway, unless a player turns around really quickly.


Here’s an example of a legal cut block.
Watch Georgia Tech’s H-back, who a) stays within five yards of the line of scrimmage, and b) dives at a Tennessee linebacker from the front.


And here’s an example of what will be an illegal low block in 2018:
This one’s downfield, and it comes from the side:


This one was called illegal at the time, infuriating then-Florida State coach Jimbo Fisher, who thought it was from the front. (That’s between 10 and 2 o’clock.)

A low block isn’t the same as a chop block, which is always illegal.
A chop block is when one player blocks low on an opponent who’s already being blocked high.

That’s a penalty no matter who’s doing it and where they are on the field.
 

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
Liked this one

5 Tips for Defending Spread Option Teams
MQ details 5 things to remember when facing a Spread Option team.

https://matchquarters.com/2017/10/06/5-tips-for-defending-spread-option-teams/#more-11638

One offensive play that has not lost its power in modern football is the option. Spread offenses utilize option principles to test the mettle of a defense’s structure. An option offense forces the defense to play assignment football. Each player on a defense must stay gap sound and understand how the structure of the defense adapts versus each option play. When defending an offense that runs a variation of the Triple Option from Spread formations, a defense must have three main components: 1) a Dive player, 2) a Quarterback player, & 3) a pitch-man. Add pulling guards and trap plays and a Spread Option offense can inflict a lot of damage if the defense is not disciplined.

One of the main keys for defending Spread Option teams is eye discipline. It is imperative that each position on a defense understands his fits and read keys. When option teams motion it creates eye “candy” and distractors for defenders, especially at the linebacker level (Jet or Orbit motion). Spread Option teams also make it difficult to blitz. When applying pressure to an option offense the defense can expose itself to being a man short if the players do not understand how the pressure changes option responsibilities.

Many defenses choose to stay in base and fit the option. This can work if the defense has better players than the offense, but in most cases staying static helps the offense learn how to pinpoint a defense’s weaknesses. Understanding how Spread Option teams want to attack a defense’s structure is crucial in defending option offenses. Below are 5 tips for defending these types of teams:

BGapKnow where the “B” gap is (“Open Gap” philosophy): It is safe to say that most offenses want to find and attack the open gap. This is not different in option offenses. Open gaps allow the offense to have a soft spot in the defense. Understanding this principle will allow a defense to predict where offenses are going to attack. The structure of the defense and the open gaps allow option teams to predict who will carry the ball. In the Spread Option, offenses most likely put their best athlete at QB and want him to run the ball on the edge. The open “B” gap will help the offense call plays. In most defenses, the defensive end to the Nose’s side (open “B” gap) has the Dive and the LB behind him will scrape, or take, the QB. Teaching a defense’s players to understand this, and having this knowledge as a coach, will allow a defensive coordinator to predict what he will see from the option.

Make sure everyone knows who has the Dive, QB, and Pitch: Option football is designed to confuse the defense and punish it when the players are not disciplined. In order to defend the Spread Option, a defense must have clearly defined rules and the players must understand how they all link together.

If running a base 4-3/4-2-5 or an Okie Front (3-4), the open “B” gap will help define who on the defense has the three options: Dive, Quarterback, and Pitch. If utilizing natural gap exchanges in its base, a defense should already have the foundational Responsibilitiesprinciples of defending the option. Using the “Open-Gap” principle, the defensive end to the strength (where the 3 tech. is set) will have the QB. He cannot close the “B” gap because the defensive tackle is anchored in that gap. The Sam LB, who is not in the gap fit will accept the role of the pitch player. The Mike, who is responsible for the “A” gap will take the Dive. To the weak side (Nose/5 tech.) the DE is the Dive player and the Will LB will take the QB responsibility. The pitch will be taken by the backside safety. The wildcard to the weakside is the Mike. If playing a team that is running Zone Option, the Mike can scrape all the way to the inside shoulder of the QB. His initial step will be to his gap, but if the Nose crosses his face (and the DE chasing the Dive – closed “B” gap) the Mike can scrape to the outside. Each player has a role and must attack their responsibility in order for the defense to work and fit correctly. Like links in a chain, each player works off the next and must make their anchor point right (fit support).

Teach gap exchanges to naturally fit the option: As stated above, teaching gap exchanges will create natural fits for a defense’s players and alleviate confusion when it comes to defending the Spread Option. Gap exchanges can create a numbers advantage against zone heavy teams. One way to utilize the gap exchange model is to adjust the alignment of a defense’s DEs. To the strength (3 tech. side), the DE can widen to a “wide 5” alignment. This allows the DE to build a wall with the play to him and have a clear view of the QB (or down the line for pullers) with play away (shoulders should stay parallel and shuffle down the line). To the weak side (Nose/5 tech.), the DE can play a “heavy” technique. In a “heavy” technique, the DE tightens his alignment on the offensive tackle, almost to a 4. This allows the DE to attack the “B” gap quicker. If the offensive tackle steps out to him (play to) he will rip inside to plug the “B” gap. This movement allows the Will to hang in his position and keep eyes on his responsibility, the QB. Versus a 2×2 spread set, this technique helps the Will cover down to the #2 WR (pitch). If the play is away, the DE is already aligned in a position that will allow him to quickly attack the dive and run down the heels of the offensive lineman. Gap exchange is not a revolutionary concept, but utilizing it can make a huge difference in run fits and defending the Spread Option.

Change responsibilities to create muddied reads: Playing static will get a defense beat against a good Spread Option team. Once an offense has figured out where a defense will align, even if using gap exchange, they can quickly formulate ways to attack the scheme (like arc releasing the OT to the “heavy” 5 tech.). Changing responsibilities by using “Hold”/”Up” calls, inserting players in gaps, or using line movement to change responsibilities can muddy the read for an option QB. Most offenses want to run the ball to the open gap. By changing the open gap a defense can force the OC to guess. Changing the read by changing the responsibilities of the defensive players can create havoc on an option offense. When changing the reads and responsibilities it is important to make them simple enough for the defensive players to understand. One example is to “hold” the DE to the open side. The “hold” call tells the DE that he now has the QB and the OLB will fold in to take the Dive. During the course of the game, the QB will assume the DE to the open gap will be the Dive player. With a “hold” call, the QB might pull it and run right into the DE. Changing the responsibilities as the game goes along keeps the offense guessing while the DC can control who gets the ball. Another example would be to flip the interior linemen by using movement. Going form an Over to an Under Front. This changes the way the entire front seven fits and a defense can find a stunting lineman running unblocked. Utilizing these calls within a defensive game plan can force the lesser ball carrier to tote the football more than the offense wants them to. These techniques can be used to defend RPO offenses that rely on Zone Read, Arc Read, and other plays tagged with WR screens.


Set up for Speed Option: Defending the Zone Read, or Spread Triple, is tough enough, but if a defense does not align properly it can expose itself to Speed Option. The most utilized formation to attack a defense with Speed Option is a 3×1 set. If a defense aligns to a 3×1 formation with an Over Front (3 tech. to the 3 WR side), the Mike will be tucked into the “A” gap and cannot help with full flow to the strong side. Utilizing an Under Front versus Trips or Trey formations allows the Mike to gain access to the edge of the box and cover down to the #3 WR. To the backside, if a defense spins to single-high or “kicks” the coverage to the 3 WR side, the weak side can be exposed to Speed Option. When defending teams that have the ability to run Speed option (especially from Pistol – two-way-go) it is important the defense aligns evenly distributed so it will not get outnumbered.
Speed Option Fits vs 10p 2×2

One adjustment that is not illustrated in the picture is to set the front away from the RB if the offense utilizes Speed Option from a 2×2 formation. Another adjustment could also be to align the Mike in a 20 (head up on the guard) to the RB’s side. This would give him a “plused” alignment to the Speed Option side. Below are two base examples of Speed Option versus 10 pers. 2×2 from a 4-3 and a 4-2-5 (full cover down):

SpdOpt



SpdOpt (4-2-5)

Staying in a two-high shell, even versus 3×1 formations, allows the defense to stay even and have a pitchman to either side. When defending a team that utilizes Speed Option from a 3×1 formation it is important to set the front away (Under) from the 3 WR side. This allows the Mike to cover down and vacate the box versus full flow. The same concept can be used against 20p teams that run Load or Speed Option from two-back sets.
 
Last edited:

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
Navy’s triple option keeps it relevant
Navy’s triple option keeps it relevant - The Daily Orange - The Independent Student Newspaper of Syracuse, New York

Navy knows it won’t snag top recruits. It can’t effectively run a pro-style offense because it doesn’t have the personnel to do so. So Navy shouldn’t thrive offensively.

But the Midshipmen do anyway, because of the triple option.

“It gives us to chance to compete against people who are week in and week out bigger and stronger and faster than we are,” head coach Ken Niumatalolo said. “… It’s who we are and have always been.”

Unlike most offenses in Division I, Navy (2-2, 1-1 American Athletic) avoids throwing the ball. This season, the Midshipmen have rushed on 88 percent of their plays, the highest mark in the NCAA, while averaging 5.4 yards per rush. Conversely, they’ve thrown the second-fewest passes in the nation (37).

Primarily with two halfbacks, a tight end and a run-first quarterback under center, Navy’s “extreme version” of a run-first offense hides its lack of talent, Niumatalolo said. In that formation, a traditional triple option gives the quarterback three choices: hand the ball to the fullback, run it himself or pitch the ball to the halfback. The quarterback decides what to do based on how the defense plays. For example, if the defense crashed the inside and the quarterback, the ball would be pitched to the halfback.

“We basically tell the opposition the exact play we’re going to run every time,” senior Zach Abey said. “And say ‘Here you go. Stop us.’”


Navy runs the ball on 88 percent of its plays this season through the traditional triple option. The formation gives a quarterback three options: hand the ball to a fullback, run it himself or pitch the ball to a halfback.

Niumatalolo learned the triple option as a quarterback at Hawaii in the late 1980s. He assumed when he arrived that he’d play a classic quarterback role and pass the ball. Instead, then 29-year-old offensive coordinator Paul Johnson offered a new system where Niumatalolo ran more than he threw. Niumatalolo bought in.

Fifteen years later, Niumatalolo was reunited with Johnson, Navy’s head coach, as his offensive line coach. The same system Niumatalolo ran in his playing days flourished as the Midshipmen led the FBS in rushing four of his first five seasons.

But Johnson left in 2007 to implement a similar system in the Atlantic Coast Conference at Georgia Tech. Niumatalolo took over Navy, promising to run a similar variation of the triple read. The Midshipmen have compiled nine winning seasons and five bowl victories under Niumatalolo.

While Navy remains in a triple option formation for almost every play, Niumatalolo’s expertise with blocking has created an array of options for his players. The Midshipmen usually run a veer, but mix in other schemes (trap and speed, midline, two way, and zone options) along with counters and the occasional passing play.

Navy’s rushing attack relies on its forward blocking. Unlike most college schemes, where lateral blocking aims to clear gaps for runners, the Midshipmen rely on their linemen to push forward, “going north to south,” Niumatalolo said, to get consistent yards.


“It’s skill,” junior quarterback Malcolm Perry said of Navy’s blocking scheme. “Being geared toward doing the right things to keep drives going.”

Niumatalolo prefers recruits who thrive in high school spread systems. He knows Navy won’t attract top dual-threat players, he said, but he knows he can get an abundance of run-first quarterbacks. Navy doesn’t recruit true wide receivers, though. Players lined up on the edge vary from blocking tight ends to fullbacks to other quarterbacks.

But roles aren’t cemented. Abey started 2017 as Navy’s primary halfback, posting 1,413 yards with 19 touchdowns. Before the annual Army-Navy game, he made a transition to quarterback, where the decision-making was put on his shoulders. But his role changed again this season with the rise of Perry. At 6-foot-2 and 212 pounds, Abey is now the Midshipmen’s goalline back.

“I wasn’t sure if I would be a quarterback,” Abey said, “but I never thought I’d be in this kind of role in an offense, being the heavy-set fullback guy.”

In Navy’s first game this season against Hawaii, Abey ran for 17 yards, far from his 109-yard average last season, but scored four touchdowns.

Navy’s scheme, combined with the versatility of its players, keeps it relevant in games. Since joining the American Athletic Conference, Navy has kept 13 of its 15 loses within 17 points. That means the final quarter of a game usually decides the outcome, Niumatalolo said.

Navy opened its inaugural AAC season in 2015 with an 11-2 record and followed that up the next year with a victory over Notre Dame. But since its 11-win campaign, the Midshipmen’s win total has dropped by two in 2016 and 2017.

“They’re all close losses,” Niumatalolo said. “Last second field goal here, possession there. It’s not like we have to reinvent the wheel. We just have to play better.”

With the losses piling up, Niumatalolo became more open to making in-game adjustments. Against Air Force last season, the Midshipmen went three-and-out on their first possession. For the rest of the game, Navy opted to run out of the shotgun.

“It’s the biggest change we’ve made ever since I’ve been here,” Niumatalolo said.

The triple option started further from the line of scrimmage and resembled a modern spread offense. Navy followed the change by scoring on six of its next seven possessions. With 15 seconds left, Abey faked a handoff and passed for a score to put the Midshipmen up for good, 48-45.

Even with that scoring outburst, Navy isn’t looking to radically change its offense in the future, Niumatalolo said. It just wants to compete with top-level teams. Whether it be taking the Commander-in-Chief’s trophy from Army this season or attempting to slow down No. 6 Notre Dame’s offense at the end of October, Navy will have a chance because of its option.

“We’ve been doing it for so long that we have so much faith in it,” Niumatalolo said. “We’ve established that when we ride the triple option, good things can happen.”
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,569
Reaction score
20,019
Glad Lea is the one dealing with this and not me. You just gave me a headache.
 

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
Glad Lea is the one dealing with this and not me. You just gave me a headache.

I love Lea so far, but I'm a little concerned as he hasn't faced the triple option all that much.

He didn't see see the triple option at all in his 3 years at UCLA or his stop in BG. Only once (GT 2013) in his 3 years at Syracuse. Once at WF (2016 Army), and once last year at ND (Navy). So only 3 total times, all different teams, in his 12 years coaching. I'm sure he learned a lot from last year's game......, but also hope he's got some good thoughts on how to improve on last year's 7 point win.
 
Top