kmoose
Banned
- Messages
- 10,298
- Reaction score
- 1,181
Ok, it's time to clear the air on some things, and put some myths to rest.
1. Notre Dame has had year after year of great recruiting classes.
I can only use Rivals.com for rankings, but here are the rankings of the classes currently represented on this team:
2003 (5th year seniors): This recruiting class was ranked 12th, with the class having an average star rating of 3.41
2004: 32nd, with 2.83 stars average
2005: 40th, with 3.00 stars average
2006: 8th, with 3.46 stars average
2007: 8th, with 3.72 stars average
So it's obvious that the "talent" is heavy in the freshman and sophomore classes. And that's what we are seeing, on the field. Aldridge, Clausen, Kamara, Parris, Tate...these have been the the guys that have made plays on offense this year. Carlson is the obvious upper classman exception.
2. Other teams are doing well, with their freshmen
I'm not going to look at each and every D-IA team's depth chart, but I seriously doubt that any of them are more heavily loaded with Freshmen and sophomores than ND's. Going off of ND's depth chart, and only going on the two deep (some of the numbers are skewed because, for instance, at TB; there are four guys listed as the #2).
On offense: On defense:
FR = 5 FR = 3
SO = 10 SO = 7
JR = 6 JR = 4
SR = 3 SR = 9
That's 15 of 24 offensive players on the two deep that are either Freshmen or Sophomores, and 10 of the 23, on defense.
Someone earlier pointed to Georgia, and their 3 Freshmen OLinemen. That's not a fair comparison. First of all, only 2 of those 3 are true Freshmen. The other one is a Redshirt Freshman, meaning that he was able to practice with the team for an entire season last year. So he should already know the system. Plus, if he was healthy enough, he took part in contact drills, and got to develop and learn the techniques their coaches use, even though he didn't get to participate in any of the actual games. Plus, Georgia may have 3 Freshmen OLinemen, but they also have 2 Sr. Linemen to help them along. They have a Sr. and Jr. wideouts, a So. QB who was the starter last year, and while they list a Redshirt Freshman as their starting tailback, his backup is a Sr.
So it's not really a fair comparison, because those three Freshmen have all kinds of experience around them.
It's pretty obvious that those who are talking about ND's youth and inexperience have a point. And it's equally obvious that ND has not been recruiting 5 star talent for years. That's not to say that this is the only thing wrong, but do you really think it isn't making righting the ship more difficult?
1. Notre Dame has had year after year of great recruiting classes.
I can only use Rivals.com for rankings, but here are the rankings of the classes currently represented on this team:
2003 (5th year seniors): This recruiting class was ranked 12th, with the class having an average star rating of 3.41
2004: 32nd, with 2.83 stars average
2005: 40th, with 3.00 stars average
2006: 8th, with 3.46 stars average
2007: 8th, with 3.72 stars average
So it's obvious that the "talent" is heavy in the freshman and sophomore classes. And that's what we are seeing, on the field. Aldridge, Clausen, Kamara, Parris, Tate...these have been the the guys that have made plays on offense this year. Carlson is the obvious upper classman exception.
2. Other teams are doing well, with their freshmen
I'm not going to look at each and every D-IA team's depth chart, but I seriously doubt that any of them are more heavily loaded with Freshmen and sophomores than ND's. Going off of ND's depth chart, and only going on the two deep (some of the numbers are skewed because, for instance, at TB; there are four guys listed as the #2).
On offense: On defense:
FR = 5 FR = 3
SO = 10 SO = 7
JR = 6 JR = 4
SR = 3 SR = 9
That's 15 of 24 offensive players on the two deep that are either Freshmen or Sophomores, and 10 of the 23, on defense.
Someone earlier pointed to Georgia, and their 3 Freshmen OLinemen. That's not a fair comparison. First of all, only 2 of those 3 are true Freshmen. The other one is a Redshirt Freshman, meaning that he was able to practice with the team for an entire season last year. So he should already know the system. Plus, if he was healthy enough, he took part in contact drills, and got to develop and learn the techniques their coaches use, even though he didn't get to participate in any of the actual games. Plus, Georgia may have 3 Freshmen OLinemen, but they also have 2 Sr. Linemen to help them along. They have a Sr. and Jr. wideouts, a So. QB who was the starter last year, and while they list a Redshirt Freshman as their starting tailback, his backup is a Sr.
So it's not really a fair comparison, because those three Freshmen have all kinds of experience around them.
It's pretty obvious that those who are talking about ND's youth and inexperience have a point. And it's equally obvious that ND has not been recruiting 5 star talent for years. That's not to say that this is the only thing wrong, but do you really think it isn't making righting the ship more difficult?
