That really is about the least logical post I've ever read here. West Virginia, though I don't think they're a great team (great offense, not great team), is infinitely more talented, offensively, than Navy. Has infinitely better runners. Navy tore ND's D up on the ground, and that with no threat of a passing attack. There's no reason at all to think that WVU wouldn't run for many more yards than Navy did against ND.
If that post is what you consider so stupid that you remember it this much later, maybe you need to look in the mirror. Because that post was perfectly sensible. What's NOT is saying that because Navy rushes for only 8 fewer yards a game than WVU, they're anywhere near as potent an offense on the ground. As if statistics exist in a vacuum. Hey, by your logic, Hawaii is the best passing offense in the world. I guess they'd tear up anyone they played. It has nothing to do with competition and style of play, right?
WVU and Navy are not comparable, talent wise. They're equal in their discipline on offense, but WVU has much better runners. They would tear our D up. I'm glad you'll be ignoring my posts, it'll save me that many stupid things to be tempted to respond to.