GoIrish41
Paterfamilius
- Messages
- 9,929
- Reaction score
- 2,119
Jeremy,
I can sympathize with your frustration, but think about this for a moment:
Don't be surprised, when you step up to "drink the Weis Koolaid", if no one passes it to you. Weis has made a lot of mistakes, and he is ultimately responsible for the product on the field. But there are too many factors at work, to lay all of the blame on Weis. I thought he was crazy for faking the field goal in the first quarter. But, if you listened to his presser, it seems it wasn't as dumb a decision as it looked at the time. According to Weis, the coaches picked up on something in their film study of Navy. EVERY TIME this season that someone had attempted a field goal from the left hash mark, Navy had used the exact same rush scheme. So the staff decided ahead of time that, if they had a FG attempt from the left hash, they would run a fake designed to beat the rush scheme of Navy. Weis said that what blew the play up, is that the key defender that HAD to rush for the play to work stayed home. I still think he should have put points on the board, but I understand that he was thinking that they needed touchdowns, not FGs, to beat Navy. I think it was a bad decision, but not bad coaching. The FG at the end of the game, I think was bad coaching. Make it and you almost definitely win the game. Miss it and you turn the ball over to a team that can barely throw the ball, in their own territory, with less than a minute left. I can't, nor will I try, to defend that decision. But still, what would have happened if Armando Allen hadn't whiffed at blocking a blitzer? You don't account for your tailback completely fanning at a block.
2 things:
1. It was 4th and 15 on the fake FG. Who the f*** runs a fake FG when you need 15 yards? In the 1st quarter? Against Navy?
2. If AA would have blocked that OLB who made the flying tackle, the DT who was already draped over Sharpley would have sacked him anyway.