not at all. just pointing out that the administration made the last three selections for the head coaching position. i don't think they clearly researched the candidates enough to make a good decision in who the coach should have been. in other words, they jumped the gun and it backfired (at least under bob davie and ty willingham).
i think cw was getting nd back, but lacked the head coaching necessary to get them to the next level.
Agree with you, Mr. Jeep.
Administration has been most definitely part of the problem. Gave Davie a contract extension, for which he promptly prepared the team for the thrilling 2001 Fiasco Bowl. Then fired him.
Bumbling into the Willingham hire resulted in the worst possible PR by firing him after 3 years. (If you recall, May, Wilbon et al made it sound like the Administration burned a cross on Ty's lawn because he didn't get 5 years like all the other coaches.)
Gambling on CW was one thing, but giving him a 10 year extension after half a season?
Lets see if any adults are working in the Main Building this time.