Actually I believe someone did do a comparison of the ND starters vs the LSU starters and as recruiting goes we had a higher average star rating per starter than LSU did...
ND had plenty of "stars"....them playing on sunday tells you how talented they were on Saturday
Actually I believe someone told you not to post junk like this unless you could back it up, say with a link. Oh, that was me. Right now. First off, stars mean almost crap, second, average star rating doesn't negate the fact our junior class had NO PEOPLE IN IT! And how many played? Can you count on 3 fingers? Third, I'm pretty sure that your memory is serving you falsely, our star rating was lower. I'm not gonna do this in depth, but here's some actual data from Scout.
Year School rank avg stars #of players
2003 LSU 2 3.67 27
2003 ND 5 3.52 21
2004 LSU 2 3.38 29
2004 ND 30 2.94 17
2005 LSU 19 3.69 13
2005 ND 27 3.27 15
Totals (avg)
2003-5 LSU 8 3.58 23
2003-5 ND 20.6 3.24 17
And I'm not even taking out all the transfers, this is just from the recruiting classes. Looking at this, back to back number 2 classes, is it a surprise that they are so good now? No, it's not. Looking at our back to back poor classes with low ratings and low numbers of players, is it surprising we can't hang with elite teams? No, it's not. The head coach can only change these things with time. As for playing on Sunday, a few good players does not a team make. Example: 2006 Fighting Irish. Not much more seems like it needs saying.
Feel free to apologize for being so wrong, I might forgive you if you grovel. :allhail:
(please take in good humor, not trying to fight here...)