Biden Presidency

Status
Not open for further replies.

drayer54

Well-known member
Messages
8,369
Reaction score
5,799
Elaborate? System? It's an incredibly direct flow, if the person creating that flow chart can access the bank records of the entities I can grab a junior and get the payment data ready in a few days.

Just to be clear, we're criminalizing nepotism, marketing off the family name, and receiving money for foreign business/lobbying? If that's what you say, I love it.

So, we're back at square one - any record Joe receiving the money? Throw the Biden family in jail, whatever, but like where's the evidence showing money hitting Joe's bank account. Please make that available so that the 90 year old can step down and into an orange jumpsuit.

FYI - You can lie on tax records, but tough to "forge" bank records unless you're keeping it in a sock under the bed.
Well, other Dems use cash and gold bars, and others use companies. I'm saying we've moved to OK, Hunter made money off Joe, and Joe was there, but Joe didn't cash in. Why wouldn't we, given the evidence that the Biden's received money, use an impeachment inquiry to investigate if Joe did receive any cash? Where did half of Hunter's salary go?

You can't say we have no evidence while half or more of the government is throwing up a shield on this.

Jprue probably thinks Menendez (D) is clean.
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,347
Reaction score
5,703
Well, other Dems use cash and gold bars, and others use companies. I'm saying we've moved to OK, Hunter made money off Joe, and Joe was there, but Joe didn't cash in. Why wouldn't we, given the evidence that the Biden's received money, use an impeachment inquiry to investigate if Joe did receive any cash? Where did half of Hunter's salary go?

You can't say we have no evidence while half or more of the government is throwing up a shield on this.

Jprue probably thinks Menendez (D) is clean.

Ok then prosecute them? I'm not saying don't. If you have access to this then by all means get them removed. Pretty progressive position to advocate for stricter lobbying regulations and ironically you want more visibility over someone's personal finances. Guess you awoke from a convenient slumber from 2016-2020 when limited financial disclosures was a-ok.

Hunter's salary went straight up his nose and to hookers. To think Hunter was sending half his salary to Joe, that would you take the position that a drug addict would go along with that and not blow that money. If that's your position, then so be it, but barring any sort real evidence you're taking the word of a selfish drug addict's text messages where he's trying to manipulate his family.

Throwing up a shield is an interesting way to put it. Would be curious if Merrick Garland has been fired yet, or if Wray is gone. Any word of the Biden's not testifying? Word be unprecedented for any of that to happen.

JPrue literally posted about the Menedez thing first, you then posted some victim complex thing about russian disinfo - tell us, who is the partisan hack again?
 

drayer54

Well-known member
Messages
8,369
Reaction score
5,799
Ok then prosecute them? I'm not saying don't. If you have access to this then by all means get them removed. Pretty progressive position to advocate for stricter lobbying regulations and ironically you want more visibility over someone's personal finances. Guess you awoke from a convenient slumber from 2016-2020 when limited financial disclosures was a-ok.

Hunter's salary went straight up his nose and to hookers. To think Hunter was sending half his salary to Joe, that would you take the position that a drug addict would go along with that and not blow that money. If that's your position, then so be it, but barring any sort real evidence you're taking the word of a selfish drug addict's text messages where he's trying to manipulate his family.

Throwing up a shield is an interesting way to put it. Would be curious if Merrick Garland has been fired yet, or if Wray is gone. Any word of the Biden's not testifying? Word be unprecedented for any of that to happen.

JPrue literally posted about the Menedez thing first, you then posted some victim complex thing about russian disinfo - tell us, who is the partisan hack again?
The menendez comment to JPRUE was regarding how hard he is pretending that the Biden thing is a nothingburger. I saw his note on Menendez.
 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
3,245
The menendez comment to JPRUE was regarding how hard he is pretending that the Biden thing is a nothingburger. I saw his note on Menendez.
I'm not "trying" anything. I'm evaluating the evidence and it continues to be found wanting.

I have supreme confidence that if there is concrete evidence linking payments for foreign policy to Biden, it would be all over the media, just like Weiner's laptop was. There would be a vote on the impeachment inquiry if House GOP had the evidence.

Instead it's the SAME shit that we've known about for years. Wait, sorry. Biden uses pseudonyms for email accounts. Truly unheard of stuff. My 6 email addresses, two with a pseudonym is a clear sign I am up to no good.


You rehash the same shit over and over again assuming it's somehow different this time.
 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
3,245
Any
Day
Now


Hunter Biden's residence was his father's house in 2019. He was also cracked out and couch surfing that year as well.

Trump literally had a Chinese bank account while he was President, but Hunter having his Dad's house as his residence means Biden was taking payments from the Chinese for foreign policy?
 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
3,245




It appears that by firing the prosecutor, as Biden has bragged about in a soon to be infamous clip, he did not relieve the pressure on Burisma's corruption!

Any Day Now™
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,575
Reaction score
20,026




It appears that by firing the prosecutor, as Biden has bragged about in a soon to be infamous clip, he did not relieve the pressure on Burisma's corruption!

Any Day Now™

That letter read like a group trying to flip the script.
 

drayer54

Well-known member
Messages
8,369
Reaction score
5,799

Isn’t that the point of the inquiry? To link the mountain of evidence of influence peddling and things Joe Biden has denied that we now know are lies and true to his bank account and records, which they concealing? No?
That’s Bidenomics

Same as above.
The Biden energy policy is insane. We’re heaving cash at anything from China, preventing energy independence here, making life tough for automakers with EV mandates that aren’t supported by demand and making our electric grid less reliable by forcing dispatchable generation offline and putting us closer or in blackouts forced by energy policy. Even NERC made energy policy a top risk in the latest report. Biden’s team doesn’t care if you are sitting at an empty pump, because they’ll say you should be in an EV and wouldn’t have this problem if you just drank the EV kool-aid. Oil is going to push higher again because of our own stupidity and inability to adapt.
 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
3,245
Isn’t that the point of the inquiry? To link the mountain of evidence of influence peddling and things Joe Biden has denied that we now know are lies and true to his bank account and records, which they concealing? No?
What he denied, wasn't illegal. It also assumes he knew that Hunter received the wire transfer.

Hunter's lawyer says it was a loan. The LLC that received the money is an investment firm.

This, according to Comer, brings up national security concerns and asking for clarification in good faith is resonable. It's not why we are having this "inquiry" (I don't care what Pelosi said, it's not real till the house votes on it) though.

If it was, I'd have to wonder if he was in a coma during the Trump administration. If only because Trump actually received $7.5M in income from Chinese as President. He had a Chinese bank account that he **gasp** LIED ABOUT CLOSING BEFORE HE WAS PRESIDENT. He also received over $150M from foreign sources WHILE HE WAS PRESIDENT. No one disputes this, but somehow it is not a national security concern to Comer or you.

Hacks. Just hacks.
 

drayer54

Well-known member
Messages
8,369
Reaction score
5,799
What he denied, wasn't illegal. It also assumes he knew that Hunter received the wire transfer.

Hunter's lawyer says it was a loan. The LLC that received the money is an investment firm.

This, according to Comer, brings up national security concerns and asking for clarification in good faith is resonable. It's not why we are having this "inquiry" (I don't care what Pelosi said, it's not real till the house votes on it) though.

If it was, I'd have to wonder if he was in a coma during the Trump administration. If only because Trump actually received $7.5M in income from Chinese as President. He had a Chinese bank account that he **gasp** LIED ABOUT CLOSING BEFORE HE WAS PRESIDENT. He also received over $150M from foreign sources WHILE HE WAS PRESIDENT. No one disputes this, but somehow it is not a national security concern to Comer or you.

Hacks. Just hacks.
Joe Biden lied about everything tied to Hunter, including using the ‘Spies Who Lie’ to discredit the laptop and then pretend he never had anything to do with it, which evolved to talking about the weather. Joe Biden has lied on this and the mountain of evidence that the Biden’s raked in cash is worth a look to see if our President is compromised or has committed at the minimum highly unethical acts in the White House.
 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
3,245
Joe Biden lied about everything tied to Hunter, including using the ‘Spies Who Lie’ to discredit the laptop and then pretend he never had anything to do with it, which evolved to talking about the weather. Joe Biden has lied on this and the mountain of evidence that the Biden’s raked in cash is worth a look to see if our President is compromised or has committed at the minimum highly unethical acts in the White House.
A hack.
 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
3,245
"Questions" are the "mountains of evidence" I guess!? 😂





Maybe tomorrow.
 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
3,245
You call someone a hack and then reply with Aaron Rupar.
I reply with VIDEO. Haven't you guys been told enough by Cack to stop deflecting like that?


Here's more of their "evidence" given context. I believe you have referenced this conversation a few times.

F7IOQ7DW0AErEfE.jpg


F7IOwuaXsAAHNH-.png

o_O
 

drayer54

Well-known member
Messages
8,369
Reaction score
5,799
How does Joe help? When they say they need Joe's help? Again- isn't the point to be able to subpoena the information not previously available? Dems love to ignore the mountain of circumstantial evidence with Joe and Hunter, which is not enough for an impeachment but is enough for an inquiry. It's also bold to say that all of that evidence really just means Joe loves Hunter.

Did Turley say they had sufficient evidence for an inquiry?
 
Last edited:

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,452
Reaction score
8,531
How does Joe help? When they say they need Joe's help? Again- isn't the point to be able to subpoena the information not previously available? Dems love to ignore the mountain of circumstantial evidence with Joe and Hunter, which is not enough for an impeachment but is enough for an inquiry. It's also bold to say that all of that evidence really just means Joe loves Hunter.

Did Turley say they had sufficient evidence for an inquiry?
This is an important note and distinction.

It would seem with all the circumstantial evidence there would be enough for an inquiry.

With that said, I’m not sure if it was the right choice to have an impeachment inquiry. The Republicans needed to believe that there was a reasonable chance that some good hard evidence would come out of the inquiry. If it doesn’t come out, it will make the Republicans look bad and “confirm” to many voters that the claims against Biden were baseless.
 

drayer54

Well-known member
Messages
8,369
Reaction score
5,799
This is an important note and distinction.

It would seem with all the circumstantial evidence there would be enough for an inquiry.

With that said, I’m not sure if it was the right choice to have an impeachment inquiry. The Republicans needed to believe that there was a reasonable chance that some good hard evidence would come out of the inquiry. If it doesn’t come out, it will make the Republicans look bad and “confirm” to many voters that the claims against Biden were baseless.
When you look at how the Bidens have profited off Joe, I think it is certainly worth a look, especially given the nature of the financial transactions from China. Apparently, the standard is to be caught holding gold bars.

 
Last edited:

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,103
Reaction score
12,939
When you look at how the Bidens have profited off Joe, I think it is certainly worth a look, especially given the nature of the financial transactions from China. Apparently, the standard is to be caught holding gold bars.


tumblr_o16n2kBlpX1ta3qyvo1_1280.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top