Search results

What it must feel like to be an Oklahoma fan right now, completely coasting under the radar and thinking “how the fuck do all these people not see that we have no business being here?” They are like Verbal Kint, sitting around watching everyone else arguing while knowing full well who Keyser...

Everyone at ESPN got the memo about swapping in Miami for ND. Herbstreit is such a disingenuous clown.

This Georgia performance is exactly why the Committee can say ND is better than Miami despite the loss. Georgia is really doing is multiple favors right now.

Agree, and there not even attempting to disguise it. Whether ND gets in or not, I just cannot see this system lasting much longer. It’s got antitrust issues all over the place.

lol, only a child would take what the committee says at face value. Please don’t respond to me again.

I’m not quite at that point, but the fact that this committee is willing to say whatever they have to say to advance their agenda does make me nervous.

What a fucking douche response.

That’s not really the type of reasoning I’m hinting at, but if they lost by 40 they would almost certainly drop to 10.

If UGA loses, there is no reason why they can’t drop to #10, right? Not predicting it, but also, why wouldn’t they drop to 10? Each team in the top 10 has an argument to be above 2 loss Georgia — especially since they lost to the same team twice.

SIAP — but if Georgia beats Bama (as we hope and expect), Georgia moves to #2 and Bama falls to #10. Meaning, there is a good likelihood they would play for a 3rd time in the Sugar Bowl 2 weeks later. Pretty lame, but also totally deserved.

I hope this is true. But, it also requires Bama to lose to a team they already beat while putting us on the chopping block should BYU win, or lose.

This is where I am at. The committee and its process are so corrupt that they are not really even trying to hide it. Honestly, I think they just don’t care that we care.

I hear you, be define “punish”? Is it punishment to drop a team in the rankings if they were never actually in the payoff field? BYU is not in the playoff currently, so it is hardly a punishment to re-rank them when they lose — that was not the case for Texas or Penn St.

Allow me to answer your question with a question: why didn’t they just put Alabama ahead of ND last week, before Bama looked bad against Auburn? My answer is this: the committee has an agenda which they hope will play out through game play, but in the event it doesn’t they simply move the...

My answer to that is this: why didn’t they just flip ND and Alabama last week? Why didn’t they wait for Bama to look bad against Auburn. To me, the only reasonable conclusion to draw is that they have an agenda, but they do not enforce it until they absolutely have to. They want ND in, but...

I don’t think it’s about the seeding. It’s about this: If BYU wins we are out, and if BYU loses MIAMI moves up and we are likely swapped out. I think we are more than likely out right now.

Both MIAMI and ND are getting fucked. Honestly, at this point the only reasonable explanation is corruption. This system will inevitably get dismantled through lawsuit. It simply cannot continue to decide who is in ad out with such transparent bias. It’s just really sad what has happened to...

This is correct. Same logic also applies to wins — OU was thoroughly outplayed by Bama and just fell backwards into the win. The core conversation nationally regarding playoff selection should be whether OU should be included in the field and not whether ND or Miami will get in — but, ESPN...

You are not completely wrong, but ND losing by a late field goal on the road, at night, in the first game of the year to a playoff contending team is a bad loss? What’s a good loss?

This is a fair analysis, especially with respect to the SEC. The only teams that I am certain are playoff worthy are OSU, Indiana, Oregon, Georgia, TAMU, and ND. The rest of these teams are good to quite good but could also lose to anyone on a given Saturday. I am fairly certain that all 3 of...