Search results

Exactly? For essentially a high 3* and 2*

Crazy to LOOK outside the Top 50? Yes To bring in Bettis' son? No Bring both Bettis/Burress in the class? Nuts NIL shouldn't have anything to do with those guys individually so not sure that's even relevant. NFL bloodlines is cool but these days does it really move the needle? (especially if...

Yea, a case of a guy committing early back in November. Believe he already signed early as well, but yea its wild.

Malik Clark as well

Possibly but I would think you definitely need a player like Penson or Hines to fill his spot. Preferably Hines

Coker would definitely fit the athletic profile, 6'4 200lb WR with 24'3 LJ and 21.8 200 meter to bat. Helluva PWO

👆👆 well said

How'd that workout for us?🤔

No need to explain the obvious to individuals who can't walk and chew gum at the same time. It's been pretty much the consensus on every forum, not everyone's comprehension is up to par.

Politically understood, but damn timing is everything.

Say what, I haven't said anything about our "3" commits, just the "2" that aren't ND level players. You can have the IQ of a rock an understand the best one is the least expendable, since he's the only prospect that has shown to be a playmaker thus far. Now you can go face the wall and STFU

Agreed, Terry was by FAR the best WR commit, the most versatile on offense and the most productive player. Burress had 25/434/17.4/5 TD last year and looks to be slightly above avg on film. JBJ had even less production at 30/369/12.3/4 TD and has less impressive film despite being around 6'3 and...

Not quite sure how long ago that was because both are considerably bigger than those listed weights, and Terry is rated higher on Rivals. 247 does have Burress rated higher at 564 and Terry in the 600s while Bettis was down at 767!!!😳😳 Crazy to think a school of our stature is even looking at...

Makes sense push out the best WR commit? Only at ND🤦🤷

I'm guessing he takes Terry's spot because it certainly won't be Bettis or Burress who decommits.

Exactly what I was getting at ALLL along but ppl didn't seem to understand.

I agree 100%, and yes alot of that lies on Stuckey's head for his early recruiting. Pecking order applies simply by making the more talented prospects first priority instead of liker commits but far less polished prospects.

Yep, crazy thing is more times than not those types of recruits end up transferring and off into the abyss. In Meadows' case I'm wondering how much Track plays intonhis decision if any, I know the guy has been battling an injury all of 2024.

Well we've seen this story a few times im recent history. We get in on a huge potential prospect early, then we take a huge lead in their recruitment. All of a sudden they blow up going from high 3*/low 4* into a 5* then $EC comes calling and then we get left at the altar. I'd say confidence...

Meadows was huge on getting SEC offers, Hines we still seem to lead for, hopefully this is more of a recognition of early blunders in WR recruiting, but highly doubtful.