Search results

Whether he’s the right guy or not. It is painful to see other programs at least shoot their shot while we’re still holding the rock getting a 5 second call.

We wouldn’t have made it. That’s even worse, lol.

This is a straw man argument. It says it only matters if they are presently difference makers. They don't have to be difference makers now for it to be significant. It all depends on how that looks. You can't lose one Sophomore and 2 Freshman WR's and replace them with 3 GT's. Or 2 GT's...

I think folks are greatly overestimating how easy it's going to be to have this much roster turn over but continuity on the field. And, again, it's not the continuity and chemistry to win 10 games. It's the continuity and chemistry to run the schedule. Which, should be in play.

Which, if true, would seem to confirm that Freeman fired Stuckey expecting those guys to stay and they left anyways, lol. That shit be funny. Players coach.

This is your assumption based on the hype that we're certainly going to get. I get it. It's the point. Results don't have to match as long as the hype stays high. On paper we'll always be looking at next year because look at his results recruiting or hitting the portal.

Haha, and I wasn't even feeling particularly frisky today. But, this shit show will do it to me. I'm pretty much over the Freeman Era hype machine and BS narrative spins.

We're going to bring in a big transfer class to augment the roster. Stone cold lock. But that's not what matters. What matters is if that sets us up to accomplish what we want next year and the years after.

This isn't how it ends. Freeman is good at two things. Hype and recruiting. Recruiting largely because of the hype. He'll land Leonard. Leonard will help land some WR's. In a month or two, folks will be back to singing his praises because such and such wasn't his fault and look who he...

I enjoy the levity you and others bring to these situations.

If it were that easy, more teams would do it. Elite defenses don't have problems accounting for a running QB that doesn't consistently complete passes.

Which wouldn't be all the surprising. Or, which also wouldn't be that surprising, that narrative is total BS. Both are a sad state affairs though for different reasons.

Haha, what an absolute shit storm of a situation here. Comically bad.

I thought the point of all this was to keep the players and ditch the coach.

Below is his schedule from last year and the teams end of season DFEI ranking in parenthesis. Temple (82) Northwestern (52) Kansas (105) Virginia (42) GT (41) UNC (118) Miami (90) BC (70) VT (69) Pitt (22) Wake (67) UCF (65) In back-to-back games against Virginia (42nd) and GT (41st), hardly...

Precisely. And, from the sounds of it. OSU isn’t giving out peanuts.

Alright, last time I'm falling for that shit.

So, he does indeed have two years of eligibility? I've seen so much back and forth on this. If he we get him for a 2nd year, then I'm much much higher on the move.

Leonard is going to win quite a few games at ND next year. And, they'll be times he looks really good doing it. I'll remain skeptical that he can do it against elite competition until he actually does. But, who can't watch some highlights and get excited. It's the offseason.

Best thing about the internet...that guy is just going about his Wednesday, completely unaware that someone on IE just called him a whore