Search results

So can we establish some full "peeing our pants" rules here? If he visits somewhere unofficially that isn't involved with a 7 on 7 tournament, then we can pee pants?

We get it. You're super cool. You're retired at 44. You're the man. Bow down.

See ya at the Irsay Y......

Better isn't the right term. More athletic? Sure, I'll give you that. More potential? Hell, why not? But not better. Because stats matter. Otherwise we wouldn't play football games and just decide everything on paper with potential.

Might want to edit that to general manager, but Interesting. Anyone have an idea who the MNT is leaning towards for a manager?

Sorry I misunderstood, but if some of those dudes are playing in the NFL currently, they were better. Results on the field matter for any "best" conversation. And flaming out of major college football isn't what the "best" do.

No, but you said he was the best receiver Kelly had. You need production over a consistent time frame for that to be valid. A couple nice plays over 1 1/2 years and then transferring to become a nobody don't get you there.

Good news my man! Stay strong and trust in the good Lord.

Guess it depends on the guaranteed NIL deal he'll get from whatever school he choses next.

TIFWIW, the "sources" for Loy are saying they think he stays in the midwest and will still end up at ND after the Georgia visit. We will see.

Lollzzz. At least he has the courtesy to not commit first before taking visits.

Prister with the "In The Film Room" story on 247. Lock it up.

Agreed. Won't stop other teams from trying. Positive is he's put out publicly that he doesn't enjoy the recruiting process, so that should help out here. Then again, if he takes a visit with anyone's grandma, brother, just to check out campuses or whatever stupid excuse, I'll check out of this...

I think there may have been one outside of Moore, but the rest had commitments in the next month. Yes, it can leave wiggle room and isnt specific, but if I'm looking at a data set, I'm going to go with the thing that has a 90% chance of something happening. Also, it's pretty easy to cross...

Son, I know you're touched in the head, but I'm not Driskell. Proven by how I've been posting here for a long time. You're part of the influx of people in the last year that just add nothing positive to site and exist just to post trash. In fact, I even criticized Driskell in another thread in...

Check the posting history player. Been here 10+ years.

Please. Everything you post is an affront to educated, thought out reason.

Numbers would match up and using reason. For example, I expect these 3 silent commits to commit some time in the next 2-3 weeks. It doesn't count in my book if he says there's a silent and then they commit two months later.