Website of the month? Please... the guy who runs it is a poseur and a coward, judging from his response to my e-mail last week. I just sent him another one too, which I'll post here. Go ahead and compare what I actually wrote with what he'll probably claim I wrote...
=====
Subject: Here I go, doing your job for you...
There's a story floating around out there about Ty Willingham being interviewed after the Pittsburgh loss and basically responding to one question by nonchalantly stating that we're still guaranteed a winning record and that's that. It's out-of-context, so there could be more to it than on the surface, but on the surface it looks pretty bad. In fact, it's mentioned in one of the very stories you linked to from your site, and I figured you'd pounce on it and run with it. (And rightfully so, I might add. Nobody should be content with 6-5.)
Apparently, you don't even read the stories you link to.
See, that's why your website sucks. You seem utterly incapable of stringing together any sort of argument on your own for why Ty should be fired. All you do is read columns by people who agree with you and parrot their words for your list of reasons. And sometimes you can't even do THAT right.
You're also afraid of any ideas that disagree with yours. Hence your response to me last week, putting words in my mouth, ignoring my actual point, and replacing logic with insults... and being so brave too, splashing my name in boldface up at the top while your own name remains a bigger secret than the President's nuclear launch codes. Am I supposed to be impressed?
Unlike you, I have no fear of ideas I disagree with. That's why I discovered your site in the first place. That's why I read the articles you link to, the ones written by people who are actually capable of logical thought. And that's why even my patience for Ty is starting to wear thin... unlike you, I'm actually capable of admitting when I might be wrong. If Notre Dame went 12-0 next year (hey, I can dream...) I'd be cheering my lungs out. You? You'd still be quoting Ty's winning percentage as "only" .6875, 17th place all-time, and calling for his head. I'm certain of it.
Oh, and since you asked... next year's coach... Urban Meyer? I sure hope not. Gollee, his wide receiver corps sure was red-hot under Lou Holtz and Bob Davie during the golden Irish years of 1996-2000. And wow, what an impressive amount of head coaching experience, 4 whole years combined at Bowling Green and Utah. His 37-8 record against the mighty MAC and MWC conferences sure speaks for itself. And there's no shame in losing to Western Michigan, Miami of Ohio and Northern Illinois, or getting blown-out by powerhouses like South Florida (22-point loss) and Toledo (18-point loss). We can overlook all that, sure! He's the hottest thing since Enron!
As hostile as you were about Ty Willingham's pedigree, it floors me to see you salivating for Urban Meyer. Let him coach in a real conference for a couple of years, and then we'll see if he's really as good as the hype. Maybe he is the real thing, but he needs to prove it before we hand him the Irish coaching job. Otherwise, you're stuck with another Bob Davie or Ron Zook... both of whom also had questionable records as assistant coaches and lackluster head coach experience. Gee, sounds a lot like Urban Meyer. (To be fair, it sounds a lot like Ty as well.)
Alrighty, your turn again. Have fun twisting my words around on your website! Here, I'll even make it easy for you. "Ty Willingham is a f---ing genius." See, you can take it out of context and splash it up on your site, and you don't even have to do any real work!
Sincerely,
Vince Young