I'm not a "Rees Defender", I was just explaining to you why everyone keeps telling you to relax on the Rees thing. It's not that you made one isolated comment that people are pointing you out for, its the continued bashing of Rees that people are getting sick of (again, i'm not talking about me, but the board in general).
I really don't think anyone is being sensitive on this. I think you only brought up Rees' play as an intro to bash him. You are continually negative and that is what people are getting down on you about. Frankly, I believe that this is the reaction you were looking for.
Instigator...
I loved the fight in our long snapper, stupid penalty, but you can't help but love his tenacity. I hope our team embodies that fight.
I loved the fight in our long snapper, stupid penalty, but you can't help but love his tenacity. I hope our team embodies that fight.
Breaking your hand in a pointless retaliatory act and failing to show poise does not embody fight. It was a dumb penalty.
Zero Turnovers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You don't know what went on. The Boilermakers were getting chippy early. They could have crossed a line. Does that mean you accept it as a coach or look the other way? no, but you can understand it
Cowart is the long snapper, he isn't even on the offensive line during regular play. He didn't have enough snaps to get frustrated over "chippy" Purdue players. When you are only playing a handful of plays, it makes it that much more important to limit your mistakes. What he did was idiotic, and if he cant hold his composure against Purdue, how are we supposed to trust him against teams like USC?
He very well may have lost his long snapping duties over that.
There should have been two interceptions, as that is the number they dropped. Also the Grey-Rees exchange fumble usually is a turnover but Rees got back on it. Floyd was also lucky to recover his fumble also.I agree even though they shoulda had one. But in the box score it shows a fat 0