J
johnnykillz
Guest
My thoughts conceded defeat so I decided to post a thread relative to my inquisitive mood. I know we have to be on the look out for trolls, as members of the boards, and suspect posters taking on false identities. During an online information technology basic course I took during one of my college academia semesters, we had a discussion on this topic, as the internet had already become the media for the very class I was taking.
I also, just a few minutes ago, googled the term. I think others will come to understand a lot by the following expert's interpretation of the modern coined tag. So who is a troll? Obviously one who participates in trolling.
And trolling is, according to Judith Donath:
I found this great quotation at Wikipedia.
This came across my mind earlier, as I had made an accusation that wasn't necessarily fact given a lack of breadth and quantity concerning the poster's responses. Of course, I would expect without calling a spade a spade, the poster to wittingly reply and in time I still think they will since I'm only testing the waters. I also sought to solicit, as I now do, the other actual trolls to realize others here are empowered with knowledge.
I also find myself trying to circumvent naïvity to trolls, as deep down I want to truly believe these people are who they say they are. Deception is easy if enough information is presented and unavailable to ordinary common folk from referrences. Essentially, if a poster has the common knowledge to make highly educated information relevant, and no source is available to common folk like me, then I'm sold...
But my real question to our board is how can they, the Trolls, harm Irish Envy? I feel like my lack of trust harms my existence here also sometimes, as I seek to fully understand if a poster is who they say they are. As many of you already know about me through other posts, I'm a skeptic way too often.
I also, just a few minutes ago, googled the term. I think others will come to understand a lot by the following expert's interpretation of the modern coined tag. So who is a troll? Obviously one who participates in trolling.
And trolling is, according to Judith Donath:
...is a game about identity deception, albeit one that is played without the consent of most of the players. The troll attempts to pass as a legitimate participant, sharing the group's common interests and concerns; the newsgroups members, if they are cognizant of trolls and other identity deceptions, attempt to both distinguish real from trolling postings, and upon judging a poster a troll, make the offending poster leave the group. Their success at the former depends on how well they — and the troll — understand identity cues; their success at the latter depends on whether the troll's enjoyment is sufficiently diminished or outweighed by the costs imposed by the group.
Trolls can be costly in several ways. A troll can disrupt the discussion on a newsgroup, disseminate bad advice, and damage the feeling of trust in the newsgroup community. Furthermore, in a group that has become sensitized to trolling — where the rate of deception is high — many honestly naïve questions may be quickly rejected as trollings. This can be quite off-putting to the new user who upon venturing a first posting is immediately bombarded with angry accusations. Even if the accusation is unfounded, being branded a troll is quite damaging to one's online reputation.
I found this great quotation at Wikipedia.
This came across my mind earlier, as I had made an accusation that wasn't necessarily fact given a lack of breadth and quantity concerning the poster's responses. Of course, I would expect without calling a spade a spade, the poster to wittingly reply and in time I still think they will since I'm only testing the waters. I also sought to solicit, as I now do, the other actual trolls to realize others here are empowered with knowledge.
I also find myself trying to circumvent naïvity to trolls, as deep down I want to truly believe these people are who they say they are. Deception is easy if enough information is presented and unavailable to ordinary common folk from referrences. Essentially, if a poster has the common knowledge to make highly educated information relevant, and no source is available to common folk like me, then I'm sold...
But my real question to our board is how can they, the Trolls, harm Irish Envy? I feel like my lack of trust harms my existence here also sometimes, as I seek to fully understand if a poster is who they say they are. As many of you already know about me through other posts, I'm a skeptic way too often.
Last edited:
lol!
)