Admission Standards

[johnnykillz]

In response to BGIF's request on 2011 Ray Drew's profile:

We could certainly have done that before a public reprimand.

You really get off on doing this to people don't you BGIF?

I want to appologize to all of the people who read my rediculously unintelligent beleagured post(s). I also want to appologize for wasting everyone's time.

And lastly, I want to thank BGIF for catching my extreme stupid-ism in the bud and calibrating me properly. If not for him, I among thousands of other folks would still feel at least 1,000,000 brain cells more intelligent.

But then again, why not chastise in public, right?

 

[Fbolt]

Get used to it-although very knowledgeable, he has a tendency to "feel the power".

 

[johnnykillz]

I think my comments being out of line "across the board" was certainly dramatic to say the least. I seldom write things worthy of reprimand.

As I had mentioned previously to the aforementioned reference, unless a student is pulling a 2.9 through college level courses, albeit outstanding athletic performance, they will be at risk of performing less than expected on SATs and ACTs.

Grades are great indication of work ethic as well.

Care to question that?

 

[IrishJayhawk]

I want to appologize to all of the people who read my retarded post(s).

Can't we use another word? I know you're being sarcastic...how about stupid? Idiotic?

I have taught many students with disabilities who have been called that name. It's just not okay.

Okay, back to the rest of the thread.

 

[johnnykillz]

Poor choice of words. Point taken for reprimand #2, and an edit is complete.

Lastly, I have a question for you?

"We," what do you have a mouse in your pocket? Please use "you." I would appreciate you changing that.

 

[IrishJayhawk]

Poor choice of words. Point taken for reprimand #2, and an edit is complete.

Not meant to be a reprimand. Be well.

 

[Junkhead]

This should be taken to PM, on both ends.