THiS IS RIDICULOUS!

GoldenChild

Hall of Famer
Messages
426
Reaction score
8
NFL Network has a Top 10 Marathon, and it starts off with Top 10 Football Factories, and it places ND at #3!!!! Number 3? Don't we hold the record for most players sent to the NFL? Usually I don't disagree with these Top 10s but this is just ridiculous. they put Miami over Nd and how long has the U been sending talent to the NFL since like the 80s? What about since the 40s like Notre Dame. I haven't finished the list, but I'm 95% sure USC will be ranked one.
 

NDOM

Banned
Messages
5,970
Reaction score
479
I'm pretty sure that Miami and Michigan have a lot more players in the NFL than we do. #3 is too high if you ask me. I would put us more around #7 or #8. We havent been a football "factory" since 1993.
 

ShamrockOnHelmet

Refreshman
Messages
2,745
Reaction score
1,750
There is an actual definition for what you are describing. Its called "recency error" or "recency bias".

Humans have a fundamental flaw in their thinking - they generally give more weight to things that occurred more recently when doing any kind of comparative evaluation or analysis. The entire academic field of history exists because humans are bad at it naturally.
 

neoroks32

New member
Messages
226
Reaction score
11
ND might not have a lot of "TOP" players but there are many ND players in the nfl look it up on nfl.com i think you can search by school, besides its not that big of deal whens the last time notre dame football has been top 3 in anything?
 

NeuteredDoomer

RIP - You are missed
Messages
6,714
Reaction score
434
There is an actual definition for what you are describing. Its called "recency error" or "recency bias".

Humans have a fundamental flaw in their thinking - they generally give more weight to things that occurred more recently when doing any kind of comparative evaluation or analysis. The entire academic field of history exists because humans are bad at it naturally.

Seems the opposite of what you posted (nice post buddy) but not sure if this rule applies to ND. As NDOM stated, and I agree, ND has not been a factory since 1993. I think, and this might be a stretch, that the football world still "hopes" ND will challenge again.

How can you not love ND? Seems the fundamentally flawed are more aware of the history of ND than the recent past.
 

ShamrockOnHelmet

Refreshman
Messages
2,745
Reaction score
1,750
Seems the opposite of what you posted (nice post buddy) but not sure if this rule applies to ND. As NDOM stated, and I agree, ND has not been a factory since 1993. I think, and this might be a stretch, that the football world still "hopes" ND will challenge again.

How can you not love ND? Seems the fundamentally flawed are more aware of the history of ND than the recent past.

I suppose I could have phrased myself better. The error is someone evaluating college football in general, and allege ND isn't high on the list of producing pro talent. Miami, for example, has only recently done so, relatively speaking (since the 70's). ND has done so for over a century. Thats the recency error I was referring to.
 

ACamp1900

Counting my ‘bet against ND’ winnings
Messages
48,945
Reaction score
11,225
If they included the U that high then they did their list off of recent success and we shouldn't be top five... if they have us that high at all it should be number one ALL TIME... I don't believe any other school has put more players in the NFL and once Tim and Bus get in the hall no other school will have put more players in the hall either... hard to argue that.
 
Top