BrooksFan1877
New member
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 0
Could Charlie have fired or replaced tenuta during the season? Or is this left up to the university? Two years and he made no difference what so ever.
Could Charlie have fired or replaced tenuta during the season? Or is this left up to the university? Two years and he made no difference what so ever.
had ND dominated and blew out Stanford last night CW could have saved his job.
That's why this is a BAD firing!!!!
The offense is fine...the defense is horrendous. Tetuta and Brown have these big reputations but have been God Awful!!!!
I wonder if Charlie didn't want to fire these guys and that is why he is being canned!!!
This is a bad, bad move...recruiting is back to being top 10 EVERY YEAR...the offense is rolling...tightn up the D and all would be good!!!
Could Charlie have fired or replaced tenuta during the season? Or is this left up to the university? Two years and he made no difference what so ever.
My brother who is a former sports agent and currently works in the front office for a MLB baseball team made an intresting point that had ND dominated and blew out Stanford last night CW could have saved his job, as most embattled coaches do in any sport, by making serious concessions by offering to fire the entire Defensive coaching staff. My brother who lives in the midwest but does not follow the Irish said it was apparent after watching the game that the defesive side of the ball is clearly the problem.
He said in his dealings with head coaches they will always offer up someones head to save their "work in progress". Never understood why CW was slow to hold his coordinators to task. Another reason why he won't be coaching ND next year I'm afraid.
They could have put Buddy Ryan at DC but the simple fact is that defense was a secondary consideration to the offense and the personel just weren't good enough.
Short of a blowout there was nothing saving Charlie this year. Defense has been the problem for 5 years now, and that falls on the head coach.
Weis' demise was his inability to recruit front seven players early. The heralded recruiting class of 2006 had zero impact players, and Notre Dame seemed to stockpile tweener defensive ends in hopes that they'd become Justin Tuck. Morrice Richardson, Kerry Neal and Kallen Wade never developed, and players like John Ryan never became more than marginal reserves.
Could Charlie have fired or replaced tenuta during the season? Or is this left up to the university? Two years and he made no difference what so ever.
Some of you guys continue to defend Weis and make ridiculous excuses for him. Like, the defense is the problem! It's not his fault! Fire the coordinators and let Chuck stay!
What, are you his brother or something? Chuck is the HC. Both sides of the ball are his responsibility. When the defense goes south, that is his fault, the fault of the defensive players, the fault of the defensive coordinators. But it is Chuck's fault, first and foremost.
If you want to defend the guy, get ready to post on the fan boards of whatever NFL team hires him next. Weis is history, thank God. I am sorry it didn't work out, but it didn't.
I recommend Keith Arnold's analysis today at irish.nbcsports.com: