SteelerNation
New member
- Messages
- 83
- Reaction score
- 2
When you wake up you'll still realize you have no evidence to this matter and what your saying is still just a thought not a fact.
Silly kid.
When you wake up you'll still realize you have no evidence to this matter and what your saying is still just a thought not a fact.
Silly kid.
GDomer- After Weis record over the last 5 years...I'm willing to take the risk. And you say, I'm childish? I bet you still think Weis is a good coach.
Not a great coach, but yes a good coach and a good coach is better than a bad coach and Gruden could possibly be a bad coach at ND. A lot of people thought Charlie would be our savior at ND, obviously by your tone, you disagree. I guess sticking with YOUR teams coach makes you childish.
GDomer, you should see by my screenname that I am use to coaches sticking around for awhile. The Steelers have had 3 coaches in the last 40 years. Let me say that again...the last 40 years...and that is Pro football. And I grew up with them in the 70's. I stuck it out with Cowher, and never called for his firing. You know why? Because he always got his team to rise to the occasion and he had slobs like Neil ODonnel and Kordell Stewart as qb and made them look like stars. he finally got a qb and won the Super Bowl. that is a coach. Charlie has an awesome offense and still falters. I wouldnt mind sticking behind Weis if i knew he was a winner and knew how to get the players to win. he doesnt. Period.
But do you honestly think Gruden is the man that can get us on the right path? Were you like so many of us to say that Weis was going to get us back on track? I just don't know anymore. I feel like if we keep changing the coaches, yes, we might get lucky, but we could also keep falling short and having to deal with losing seasons. I think at least giveing Weis more time, for right now, gives us the best chance to get an NC in the next couple of years.
Truth be told, GD...I was a little to harsh on Charlie when he got hired and warmed up to him. Only because of my bias being a Steeler fan. I hate the Patriots...and the last thing I wanted was a Patriot coach guiding the Irish. So I was anti-Weis out of the gate. But he won me over...and before I knew it I was defending him left and right. I loved his attitude...still do...loved his recruiting...still do....but it just comes down to results. Buddy, if it were up to me, I would love to see Weis stay on as AD because he loves Notre Dame. How about that all of you? I have been calling for Charlies job but think he has our best interest at heart. Let a true coach bring us back to respectability and let Weis stay on because he wants that to.
That is the most pathetic thing in the world.. I'm bias on a coach because he was OC, DC, or HC for a pro team I hate so much. Wow! Just wow!! I don't like the hire because he came from a Pro team I hate.. Talk about childish..
I remember people saying Pete Carroll was an average NFL coach, and that he wouldn't make it in College.
I'm not 100% sold on Gruden at ND, but the guy is a young and comes with personality. Whether or not hes the right fit for us I don't know, but he is a good coach.
Pete Carroll actually won a division title and led his teams to the playoffs twice. The Jets never really gave him a chance. So, really, Pete Carroll wasn't a bad NFL coach; 33-31 career recrod.
*smiling*...must be nice to be unbiased in life, Dirty. But judging by your screenname...you've never done that. lol
Timm said he was an "average" NFL coach and you pointed out his 33-31 record. Sounds pretty average. And the Pats gave him a chance and then his teams got worse every season. Then the Pats made a pretty good hire with the next guy....
Timm said he was an "average" NFL coach and you pointed out his 33-31 record. Sounds pretty average. And the Pats gave him a chance and then his teams got worse every season. Then the Pats made a pretty good hire with the next guy....
My screen name is what is, just a screen name. As for being unbias, I thought the Weis hire was a step above the clown that was coaching the program. Matter of fact, I stop watching ND games after Ty's first year because I knew he was going to lead ND down a slippery slope. I also thought Jon Tenuta forced his 4-3 scheme to soon. You can't run 4-3 scheme with 3-4 personnel. These kids just had a full year in the 3-4 scheme only to be thrown into the fire again to have a months to learn a new scheme.
But the guy led the team to the playoffs twice in five years and, by your standards, two good years out every five makes a guy a good coach so.....
I'll take a coach who led his team to two BCS Bowls and who has a team that has improved each year over the past two years over a coach who took over a Super Bowl Patriots team in 1996 and made them an average team in 3 years.
You already know that I'm not in favor of firing Weis. But, I have to ask, how about a guy who took a bunch of "crappy Willingham recruits" to BCS bowls (including one with a junior led team) and won't be taking his five star guys to a BCS game in a year when many of them are juniors?
He's improved over the last three but it's on the heels of a drastic fall off. It would be hard not to improve on 3-9.
I would just like to see the university hire a proven, winning head coach with experience in recruiting and winning big games (and preferably a national championship). In a pinch, at least a Super Bowl. No more "wunderkind" coordinators...I want someone who has been to the top of the heap and knows how to get back there. Plus, I want someone who knows hoe to relate to young players and the difference between the college and pro game.
I could coach the Browns to 6 wins next year and be the savior of Cleveland or I could lose 3 games at ND and be the goat of college football. That's why the ND job is viewed as an unattractive one.
I usually ignore people like Mariotti or Cowherd or Forde but theyer words always make it onto here. Why do people love reading negativity so much?
My screen name is what is, just a screen name. As for being unbias, I thought the Weis hire was a step above the clown that was coaching the program. Matter of fact, I stop watching ND games after Ty's first year because I knew he was going to lead ND down a slippery slope. I also thought Jon Tenuta forced his 4-3 scheme to soon. You can't run 4-3 scheme with 3-4 personnel. These kids just had a full year in the 3-4 scheme only to be thrown into the fire again to have a months to learn a new scheme.
Same be said with Jon Gurden.. I wouldn't say Tampa Bay made a better hire but Jon teams got worse and worse in due time..
You are right but the NFL is alot different then college. The coach isn't in complete control of his roster. If you look at it when TB won the Super Bowl the had a great but aging D, and an offense with very little talent. Over the next few years they lost players and replaced very few guys with veterans. Thats why they still suck because they are now a talentless team.
Just a reminder to those who say Gruden only won because he had Dungys player, well don't forget they beat Oakland in the Super Bowl. The team Gruden helped build and took from 8-8 to 12-4 and an AFC title game.
You are right but the NFL is alot different then college. The coach isn't in complete control of his roster. If you look at it when TB won the Super Bowl the had a great but aging D, and an offense with very little talent. Over the next few years they lost players and replaced very few guys with veterans. Thats why they still suck because they are now a talentless team.
Just a reminder to those who say Gruden only won because he had Dungys player, well don't forget they beat Oakland in the Super Bowl. The team Gruden helped build and took from 8-8 to 12-4 and an AFC title game.