You ever ask yourself why ND was so positioned to win NC's back then? Because we did not play the hardest schedule around. We played some tough ones, but the hardest schedules got ND losses.
OMG, are you trying to say ND's NC's were because of favorable scheduling? If so, this has to be one of the most inaccurate statments ever! ND's last NC we had the #1 SOS in the country. On the road to our NC we knocked of #1 Miami, then #1 USC, #3 Michigan, top ten Penn, top 25 Pitt. Over the last 10 years our SOS has been good, but not really up to ND's standard, and the future looks just sicking. Our predicted SOS in 08 is around #65; and gets worse after that.
As far as the 95 schedule, there were some patsys on it, but Navy is on the schedule every year, there's a historical component there that real ND fans know about. Navyhas had their ups and downs, but still they are no Duke. Navy owns Duke and has only 3 losing seasons since 95, and has been in bowl games everyone of those years except those 3. Duke has not had a winning season and has not been in a bowl since 94. Navy has owned Duke the last 6 years in a row, and has won 8 out of the last 10, and their overall record is 20-12 . In 1995 ND also played Texas, Ohio State, Washington (who was good then) USC, and Florida State. Also, all the patsies on that schedule would have spanked Duke every day of the week, and twice on sunday.
If you cant see that were dumbing down and trying to schedule a NC you're delusional. Some fans are for it and they don't care. I've been a ND fan for too long, and personally, I hate it. Nice try on the 95 schedule, but it blows anything we've played in the last decade away!