Firstly that nickname, DeSanctimonious sucks. SAD!
He's so scared of DeSantis.
CA House races have 60% of the votes counted. Florida declared a winner in 62 minutes.
headlineusa.com
With today's technology and a mobile society, there's no reason the counts can't be finished within 48 hours or less.
Read an article last night that says it could be a struggle to get that position.
Boehner and Ryan can confirm.
That wasn't the point of the post you quoted.
www.azmirror.com
I gotta wonder why anyone would want it.
Another race where candidate quality mattered. Kelly isn't even super popular, but he went up against a terrible candidate who ran a terrible campaign and it made it easier to hide his voting record and be more appealing to swing-voters. Would've been a flip if Doug Ducey ran, but noooo. The orange dumbass had to make it his mission to make Ducey unelectable going forward because he had the temerity to not spew garbage about dominion voting machines.
Until a pack of election-counting cowboys on horses clear the desert with all ballots counted by hand in a schooner arrives to the people who operate the internet button sometime in December, it cannot be official.
www.politico.com
Sure laws are laws, but that doesn't mean they fit today. As an example......There's an antiquated law still on the books in a state that says someone must walk ahead of a car holding a lantern so as not to frighten the horses. Written a long time ago, but still a law.That wasn't the point of the post you quoted.
That said, state laws are state laws...
Why Arizona’s ballot count takes longer than Florida’s
Why can’t Arizona count ballots as quickly as Florida? In the last few days, this has become a common refrain
No they won't. SS won't get touched. What never gets reported is that when the GOP talks about doing away with SS, they are talking about replacing it with a better model. I've mentioned before that talk about SS going under has been going on since at least the 70's, yet it's still here.
C'mon, you know that's a bad take. Arizona updates their election laws regularly (including this year). They make deliberate choices, most based around "election integrity".
One I can think of is for each citizen to have more influence in their own earnings and what they receive when they decide to collect. Set a minimum that every citizen would receive regardless. Then each citizen gets to use their contributions like an investment account where they can grow it, yet with some protection and they can't receive it until they hit 65 like today.
Sure it's a bad take. I knew it when I said it, but it's an example. Updating election laws annually may or may not be good. I'm all for getting the votes counted correctly, regardless if it's a tight race or a blowout. Tell me why states, not just AZ can't have votes counted within a couple of days?
This would collapse the system almost instantly. The people that rely most on SS will be the most aggressive on pulling out the max allowable as soon as they can. Those that don't need the money will take out their amounts and move it into their private investments. The pooled security of SS will be negated when everything gets sucked out.
Election day ballot drop offs and late mail in voting.
Uh yeah. That’s the exact rationale we heard prior to January 6th and Roe being overturned. They’re crazy but not that crazy, right?
Put it all in crypto! What could go wrong?
Al Sharpton was better when he was fat and wore an Adidas jogging suit.lol
Sharpton Compares Stacey Abrams to Moses | Headline USA
(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) Appearing on MSNBC’s election-night panel, notorious race-hustler Al Sharpton lamented, alongside Morning Joe host Joe Scarborough, the decisive defeat of Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, even comparing her to the biblical figure of Moses. According to...
