U
UNTITLEDPROJECT
Guest
Posted by CBiebel on the ESPN forums.
Fifteen years ago ND was looking good in early November. They'd lost to Michigan, but had risen back in the polls to #1. Back then, the bowls made very early agreements on who would go to their games. The Sugar Bowl had given an early offer to ND to play the SEC Champ and ND accepted.
Then disaster struck. After ND had built a sizable lead against Tennessee at home, UT blocked a FG attempt, returned it for a TD (a 10 point swing), and in the process, injured ND's star kicker/punter, Craig Hentrick. UT came back and won the game (ND missed a potentially game winning FG by their backup kicker).
The next week ND lost 35-13 at PSU.
Everyone was complaining about ND's early deal with the Sugar Bowl. They yelled that ND didn't deserve it and that #3 UF would kill them. They said that UF deserved a better opponent.
In a restaurant in New Orleans, a waiter told Lou Holtz a joke: "What's the difference between ND and Cheerios? Cheerios belongs in a bowl." (Holtz replied with one of his own: "What's the difference between Lou Holtz and a golf pro? A golf pro gives a tip")
When that story became public, the game started to be referred to as the "Cheerios game."
ND wasn't expected to do well with UF. ND's defense had been so horrible that Holtz fired his DC and took over calling the defense as well as the offense. ND went with a "bend, don't break" defense that allowed UF to get a ton of yards, but most of their drives resulted in FGs.
The score was 16-7 at the half and the announcers were saying ND was lucky to keep it that close with their poor defense that allowed UF to go down the field. However, that same defense was given a lot of praise in the 2nd half when ND, led by Jerome Bettis, ran all over UF and traded FGs for TDs.
UF set a Sugar Bowl record of 5 FGs, but unfortunately for them, ND 5 TDs to counter that. The final score was ND 39 UF 28.
Fifteen years later it could be ND vs UF in the Sugar Bowl again, with people saying that ND "doesn't deserve to be there."
Fifteen years ago ND was looking good in early November. They'd lost to Michigan, but had risen back in the polls to #1. Back then, the bowls made very early agreements on who would go to their games. The Sugar Bowl had given an early offer to ND to play the SEC Champ and ND accepted.
Then disaster struck. After ND had built a sizable lead against Tennessee at home, UT blocked a FG attempt, returned it for a TD (a 10 point swing), and in the process, injured ND's star kicker/punter, Craig Hentrick. UT came back and won the game (ND missed a potentially game winning FG by their backup kicker).
The next week ND lost 35-13 at PSU.
Everyone was complaining about ND's early deal with the Sugar Bowl. They yelled that ND didn't deserve it and that #3 UF would kill them. They said that UF deserved a better opponent.
In a restaurant in New Orleans, a waiter told Lou Holtz a joke: "What's the difference between ND and Cheerios? Cheerios belongs in a bowl." (Holtz replied with one of his own: "What's the difference between Lou Holtz and a golf pro? A golf pro gives a tip")
When that story became public, the game started to be referred to as the "Cheerios game."
ND wasn't expected to do well with UF. ND's defense had been so horrible that Holtz fired his DC and took over calling the defense as well as the offense. ND went with a "bend, don't break" defense that allowed UF to get a ton of yards, but most of their drives resulted in FGs.
The score was 16-7 at the half and the announcers were saying ND was lucky to keep it that close with their poor defense that allowed UF to go down the field. However, that same defense was given a lot of praise in the 2nd half when ND, led by Jerome Bettis, ran all over UF and traded FGs for TDs.
UF set a Sugar Bowl record of 5 FGs, but unfortunately for them, ND 5 TDs to counter that. The final score was ND 39 UF 28.
Fifteen years later it could be ND vs UF in the Sugar Bowl again, with people saying that ND "doesn't deserve to be there."
