I hate to just show back up and do this.....but damn, the rampant and unfounded speculation in this thread alone is why I don't come around much anymore.
I know it's hard for some of the members here, but can we not act like everyone is upset at ND. They are 3-1. 23-3 in last 26 regular season games and that's with a ton of adversity. The future is bright for ND. Great programs find ways to win, few years ago all this program did was find ways to lose.
You better start showing up more around here or I am driving over to kick your @ss, and I don't care if you are packing!
I have a friend who is on ISD who is enamored with Sean Mele, over there who does a weekly breakdown of the games. My friend thinks Sean figured out the problem with the running game. I think my friend is right about Sean, and Sean is right about the running game.
Remember after the MSU game when Kelly said that the running game problems weren't just on the interior linemen? To really oversimplify on certain formations ND only ran certain directions until MSU. Cam's longest runs came off of running against the power, which was a break in tendency.
Also Tarean Folston's best run he bounced away from the safety he saw lurking to the left, which happened to be the power side, so the run ran away from that to the other side.
Also, our running has devolved through happenstance to run at a numeric advantage of the opponent. However you want to say it. The majority of the running plays Saturday against MSU were run against numeric superiority. Tendencies changed three times in the game for our best three runs.
And we are not getting hung up on the double teams anywhere near as much anymore, and are starting to get to the second level. If anything, too quickly. They will get balance. This is exciting!
If the coaches design a running game around play action and establishing numerical superiority, we will grow a running game out of nowhere and help our passing game!