I'm bored with Bonds. The only element of the whole mess that interests me, and mostly from a sociological/philosophical/moral standpoint is the behavior of fans such as Nayers there. The San Francisco fans - what in the world are those people thinking? What's cheerable about Bonds? He's not an anti-hero. He's nothing. It's like cheering a disease. I wonder about how a Giants fan can take his son to the ballpark and cheer Barry Bonds. What do you even say? "Hey, son, sure, he's a jerk, and sure he hates us, and sure he's the greatest cheater in the history of professional sports, and sure his accomplishments are meaningless, but aren't homers great?" I just can't fathom it. Now, the defensiveness of the Bay Area fans when the subject of Bonds is broached is kind of reassuring, since it indicates that they've at least got some sense that their cheering for him is an embarrassment. But why not just disown a guy who so obviously deserves it, and who could not have made it any easier than he has? I'm a Cubs fan (nice snag, Juan) and Sammy Sosa was dead to me the moment he was caught corking his bat. The later "revelations" about his steroid abuse were overkill. Now, Cub fans GENERALLY (meaning not me) kept cheering Sammy for a little while after he was caught with the corked bat, because he hit. And that was a shame, but once his production dropped (but not much) the next season, Cub fans turned on him immediately, and he was gone and forgotten, immediately. Disowned by an entire fanbase. In the beginning of 03 Sammy Sosa was the biggest superstar in Chi. By the end of 04 he was shipped out for mid-level players and nobody missed him. Now it's as if he never played for the Cubs. And this was before all the steroid testimony. So why can't SF fans do the same? That's all I wonder. There has to be an objectivity, even in sports fandom. A player shouldn't have to kill someone (OJ) for a fanbase (USC) to disown him, or to admit that he's done what he's done. You can see USC fans any day attacking the alleged victim in the Mark Sanchez case. If he's convicted of course they'll disown him, but for now? She's a whore, how dare she, etc. Players who beat people up, shoot people, drive drunk, these things are all ignored. Even Irish fans get incredibly defensive when Lou Holtz's history of NCAA infractions is mentioned. Me, I got tired of it. I now just admit that while I like him as a person, and admire him as a coach, he's incapable of running a clean program - and that that says something about him.
But this has run long. The main point is that I don't understand why the SF fans can't show some brains, and some dignity, and disown Bonds as the rest of the world has, and as the Cub fans did so quickly with Sosa. It's do-able.