jiggafini19
The Pope
- Messages
- 7,370
- Reaction score
- 58
Removed.
Last edited by a moderator:
KMac151993 said:Please would someone remind me why we need Clausen?
KMac151993 said:Please would someone remind me why we need Clausen?
iloveirish_12 said:Because he is the Lebron James of football. Thats way and not to metion he has some very good players coming with him.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion but I can find NO reason to believe He will commit early NOR to think he will commit to ND.jkmoline said:just a feeling here, but I would bet my house that Claussen will be the first 2007 verb, and i would bet the announcment of it comes very quickly after signing day, again nothing but speculation but I think he is on board, and I think we will be hearing about it as soon as signing day passes, and whether you think this kid is the best high school qb ever or you think he is an over hyped bag of wind, realize that recruits will follow, news coverage will hype up, and ND will be the talk of the football world if he jumps on first...2007's class will be the best ever at ND
KMac151993 said:Jigga I agree with you but my point is then why go out and sign two good QB's this year when 1 or 0 are needed if we get Claussen. This year we really needed help with the Defense and got some but some glaring holes are at LB still and especially DL. I would rather have seen us drop Frazier and picked up another DL if Claussen is a 'lock' to come play for us in 2007. By then Quinn will be gone and Jones will have redshirted. Because right now in 2007 we will have 3 QB's all in the same year of eligibility.
KMac151993 said:I know but at the same time a log jam of talent means wasted space. I remember when Dorsey Levens transfered from ND and he turned out to be a pretty solid back but was stuck on a loaded team. I couldn't imagine being D. Jones or Frazier next fall as one of those guys is going to end up 5th string.
All of this is true. Now all we have to do is convince the recruits that a logjam at their position is really good for them. If you believe that's easy I have a portfolio of bridges you might like to buy.Svoboda said:True, but I'd rather have that logjam then have someone get injured only to find out he is irreplacable.
Seems to have worked out for the nations elite... it's about time we have logjams in talent. That means practices are harder, more competitive which will lead to a better on the field product.
bigdon said:All of this is true. Now all we have to do is convince the recruits that a logjam at their position is really good for them. If you believe that's easy I have a portfolio of bridges you might like to buy.
scooper said:USC does it. And all indications are that the #1 QB is looking to join the logjam here. It's a good problem to have for a change, isn't it?
One of my biggest logjam concerns is getting the Oline classes spread out after this year's desparate Ty-induced hog-molly binge. We needed this group, but from now on, they have to be balanced out or we'll be looking at the same problem down the line.
Where are your sources that are saying that "all indications are that the #1QB is looking to join the logjam here"? Unless you can identify them that is mere speculation. If you're going to name recruiting services, forget it. They are merely speculating at this point. Just because he attended the Junior Day means nothing more than he might be interested. Let's have your "all indication" sources!!scooper said:USC does it. And all indications are that the #1 QB is looking to join the logjam here. It's a good problem to have for a change, isn't it?
One of my biggest logjam concerns is getting the Oline classes spread out after this year's desparate Ty-induced hog-molly binge. We needed this group, but from now on, they have to be balanced out or we'll be looking at the same problem down the line.