While I wouldn't be as blunt as ekinggill, the argument against Teo is pretty clear. This is pretty much what I have been reading from our end of the spectrum and why I wanted to come see if you guys have the same type of argument against Johnny. After what we have talked about it I think it would be fair to say that had Pitt kicked a field goal then Teo would no longer be in contention because he would no longer be "the best player on the best team" which is the main thing he has going for him.
I think the best thing Teo has going for him is the intangibles he does for the team and university. He has more character than anyone else in contention for the award and that is a big element of it. He also has a very compelling story aside from being on an undefeated team with a good defense. The guy has overcome more adversity this season and excelled (
with mediocre stats) than most people will in a decade. The guy is a testament to all that is good in the world. He has done all this and overcome everything he has overcome while also being a fantastic student and leader on the field.
The argument for Johnny is purely stat driven. Well that and beating Bama at home.
Comparing them is obviously going to lead to disagreement. Your guy is sweet, so is ours.
Manti means a lot to ND fans because he represents the rebirth of this program. He came back rather than being a likely first round pick and look at what he's lead the team to.
I'm happy he's even in consideration to be honest. How often do defensive players get this kind of recognition? It's pretty cool despite what team you're a fan of. If it were a linebacker on your team you'd be arguing the same things we are.
