Sanctions should follow the coach

Sanctions should follow the coach

  • Yes, make the fool suffer bad

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes, more than 'probation', but uncertain as to what

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, it should stay largely with the prior school

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Another dumb question/topic by Stoney

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    4
  • Poll closed .

stonebreakerwasgod

LMI steals vbucks
Messages
7,295
Reaction score
623
Title speaks for itself. I don't like the fact that Kelvin Sampson (who should be let go shortly) of IU, ran away from a problem at OU, and brought more problems to Indiana. All this after he promised to run a clean program.
Someone desperate for some publicity and to turn their program around (just find a AD on the near chopping block), and he'll get another shot at a lesser school.

I think that if IU can get penalized, then the coach who caused it should be made to suffer even more. Out of coaching for a year or two, and one or two year sanctions (perhaps scholarships) to the school that hires him. This would deter coaches from not only committing the violations, but schools from hiring him. Just sayin.

What say you?
 

SoCalDomer

New member
Messages
4,954
Reaction score
412
I agree about sanctions following the coach. I don't know enough about the Sampson situation to comment on it specifically.

But (here comes the cyncial me) this would require the NCAA to be pro-active in implementing rules and enforcing them. Right now, they seem like Major League baseball - completely reactionary.
 

IrishGrizz

New member
Messages
1,748
Reaction score
120
No doubt, Stoney, the Coach who leaves a school, (whether a HC or assistant who gets caught) should carry their shame like a scarlet letter for a set period of time.
I wish they were banned from coaching again at that sport for as long as the penalty lasts, too.
 
Top