D-BOE34
F*** Michigan
- Messages
- 1,730
- Reaction score
- 81
We have all read a million ideas about what the NCAA should do with cheating programs and whether or not NCAA football players should be paid. Some for and some against. What do you think is the best way to help settle these situations? Obviously, a small step can go a long way. I am wondering your opinion on how schools should be punished if guilty and also, what can the NCAA do to help the college football player survive money wise.
My take:
Punishments: I think NCAA should drop the bomb every time a school is busted. Set up a guideline for the infraction. Do this this and this ... you get this. Do that that and that you will get that.
USC ... to me would have been bowl banned for 3 years, lost half schollies for 4 years and if in appeal process you still suffer. Guilty until proven innocent. tOSU .... you lied. Okay, we, NCAA, hereby sentence you to 2 year bowl ban and lose half your scholarships for 2 years. No more handouts for each payer. Team game equals team trophy. No pants ...
Players found guilty once lose the season and that eligibility for severe infractions. Twice, your out of college sports period in the NCAA. Go NAIA where money isn't an option. If so, well, you are lucky to be found by some random rich guy that wants to pay you to play ball in a place like Marshall, MO... GO VIKES!!!
Paid players: I do actually believe in a small stipend. This my friends is still something I don't understand enough to make a logical guess on I would say?!? Not sure how I would word that ... I have a best friend that was a VBALL player at MO STATE ... great athlete. She was offered with her full ride and a $600/month "living expense if she moved from the dorms." . Do all NCAA athletes get that? All the other girls I really were able to know were not all on full rides and what not so it was hard to gage who got what. Anyway ... I don't feel I know enough about what and what is not offered in a scholarship for an athlete by each school. This is the one I want to know what you guys really think. Simply for the fact that several of you have played big time ball (or stick) and several have not.
Of course the NCAA would set up a staircase system for the level of authority used in each case. General guidelines. Guy at Miami of Ohio, lets say, gets approached by a buddy that literally has a beat up '91 Dynasty he is just sitting on and says, "Why don't you just take my beat *** Dynasty? You don't have a ride and I have an extra. You need to buy a battery and get it to pass inspection but shouldn't be more than a few hundy to get her rolling. I won't charge you for it. You need to get your sister to and from school as well as yourself." That athlete says thanks but no thanks because I could lose a season of playing because some other guy may get the same offer at USC but for a Caddy. Got it. thats what rules are for. With some sort of a small stipend the Miami of Ohio kid can maybe pay a bit of gas to hitch a ride and not be drowned. I would be more than happy to help a buddy get him or his sister to and from if they fall on hard times because he doesn't have time to work with raising a sibling while also trying to combine an education with working. After a while though a tank of gas would be appreciated. Thats me though.
Sorry for the stretch post but what is your take?
DISCLAIMER: Really hate doing this but if a thread of this caliber has been started covering both issues please delete me as a poster. I clearly can't navigate the site. I do also hate the hijacking of other threads when they get a general post that is like a fork in the road. One response takes the thread here and the other is taking it there. Sorry guys if this is a repeat but in the end .... I ALSO HATE USC!!! Meow?...
My take:
Punishments: I think NCAA should drop the bomb every time a school is busted. Set up a guideline for the infraction. Do this this and this ... you get this. Do that that and that you will get that.
USC ... to me would have been bowl banned for 3 years, lost half schollies for 4 years and if in appeal process you still suffer. Guilty until proven innocent. tOSU .... you lied. Okay, we, NCAA, hereby sentence you to 2 year bowl ban and lose half your scholarships for 2 years. No more handouts for each payer. Team game equals team trophy. No pants ...
Players found guilty once lose the season and that eligibility for severe infractions. Twice, your out of college sports period in the NCAA. Go NAIA where money isn't an option. If so, well, you are lucky to be found by some random rich guy that wants to pay you to play ball in a place like Marshall, MO... GO VIKES!!!
Paid players: I do actually believe in a small stipend. This my friends is still something I don't understand enough to make a logical guess on I would say?!? Not sure how I would word that ... I have a best friend that was a VBALL player at MO STATE ... great athlete. She was offered with her full ride and a $600/month "living expense if she moved from the dorms." . Do all NCAA athletes get that? All the other girls I really were able to know were not all on full rides and what not so it was hard to gage who got what. Anyway ... I don't feel I know enough about what and what is not offered in a scholarship for an athlete by each school. This is the one I want to know what you guys really think. Simply for the fact that several of you have played big time ball (or stick) and several have not.
Of course the NCAA would set up a staircase system for the level of authority used in each case. General guidelines. Guy at Miami of Ohio, lets say, gets approached by a buddy that literally has a beat up '91 Dynasty he is just sitting on and says, "Why don't you just take my beat *** Dynasty? You don't have a ride and I have an extra. You need to buy a battery and get it to pass inspection but shouldn't be more than a few hundy to get her rolling. I won't charge you for it. You need to get your sister to and from school as well as yourself." That athlete says thanks but no thanks because I could lose a season of playing because some other guy may get the same offer at USC but for a Caddy. Got it. thats what rules are for. With some sort of a small stipend the Miami of Ohio kid can maybe pay a bit of gas to hitch a ride and not be drowned. I would be more than happy to help a buddy get him or his sister to and from if they fall on hard times because he doesn't have time to work with raising a sibling while also trying to combine an education with working. After a while though a tank of gas would be appreciated. Thats me though.
Sorry for the stretch post but what is your take?
DISCLAIMER: Really hate doing this but if a thread of this caliber has been started covering both issues please delete me as a poster. I clearly can't navigate the site. I do also hate the hijacking of other threads when they get a general post that is like a fork in the road. One response takes the thread here and the other is taking it there. Sorry guys if this is a repeat but in the end .... I ALSO HATE USC!!! Meow?...