B
beatrizandjess
Guest
Just read that they will be out until mid December do to knee strains. Sucks for us they could have made a huge difference against USC
Last edited:
Just read that they will be out until mid December do to knee strains. Sucks for us they could have made a huge difference against USC
Just read that they will be out until mid December do to knee strains. Sucks for us they could have made a huge difference against USC
hey, we need to beat Syracuse first. they will enter ND Stadium all full of piss and vinegar and charlie will just do what he has to do to get by instead of flat out burying somebody. i want to see us put up half a hunge this saturday and pitch a shutout on D with manti in the house!
man you guys really have no faith? stanford kept it close for most of the game against usc saturday, oregon state beat them, do you think those guys have the talent we do??
man you guys really have no faith? stanford kept it close for most of the game against usc saturday, oregon state beat them, do you think those guys have the talent we do??
I think Oregon State would beat us pretty bad too. Who have we beat again? I am confused at how all the sudden we are going to be able to compete with a team that totally buried OSU!!!
I agree using padomernut's logic Nd lost to MSU 23-7, OSU beat MSU 45-7, and USC beat OSU 35-3 so ND should loss to USC 34-6...wait that does make sense.
Hmmm....
No, I don't think so. MSU was 16 points better than we were. OSU was 38 points better than MSU so OSU is 54 points better than we are. USC was 28 points better than OSU, who is 54 points better than we are so.....USC 82-ND 0??
Losing Floyd really hurts my head, and my heart, and everywhere else in my body. My man-crush on him is almost off the charts. What a stud. Really took the wind out of my sails on Saturday. And then to combine that with my favorite defensive player getting injured later on was even worse. But we were still playing great football, esp on d, so I was somewhat enthused. And then the ending came, and well, what a friggin bummer.
Get well soon guys...
I agree using padomernut's logic Nd lost to MSU 23-7, OSU beat MSU 45-7, and USC beat OSU 35-3 so ND should loss to USC 34-6...wait that does make sense.[/QUOT
I would like to apologize for any confusion in my post. I was not trying to use the fact that we beat Stanford to show we will beat USC. I was simply trying to refute the argument that Oregon State would beat us pretty good. I just dont think that is true at all. Again, sorry for the confusion.
I agree using padomernut's logic Nd lost to MSU 23-7, OSU beat MSU 45-7, and USC beat OSU 35-3 so ND should loss to USC 34-6...wait that does make sense.[/QUOT
I would like to apologize for any confusion in my post. I was not trying to use the fact that we beat Stanford to show we will beat USC. I was simply trying to refute the argument that Oregon State would beat us pretty good. I just dont think that is true at all. Again, sorry for the confusion.
It's useless to even discuss how we would fare against Oregon State, but it's Monday afternoon and I don't have anything to do....so what makes you think that OSU wouldn't beat us handily?
They are the 21st ranked team in the country. I've watched them play a few times this year and they are a well balanced team with a stud running back in Jacquizz Rodgers. If you think that OSU is small potatoes than I would like to call your attention to the two times we've played them in Bowl Games:
2001 Fiesta Bowl
Oregon State 41-ND 9
2004 Insight Bowl
Oregon State 38-ND 21
A lot of this discussion is ridiculous. What teams do against other teams in different weeks is irrelevant. If Stanford beat USC that does not mean that we can beat USC. If Syracuse beat the shit out of Pitt, it would not mean that we can't beat them. Every game must be looked at individually. On any given day, any team can beat another team. You can make an educated prediction by looking at the following factors:
1. Talent
2. Execution
3. Coaching
4. Gameday Readiness
The third point is probably the most important, you are either ready to play or you are not. Some teams are talented enough to win when not prepared or game ready, for example, USC beating Stanford last week. It is not who beat who, but who shows up on Saturday. I hope our Irish show up, and shine the next two Saturdays and another date to be named.
I'm not sure if this would fit under coaching, but bad gameplanning. (The attempt to implement a hybrid spread option at the GT game has been discussed ad nauseum so I won't do so further). Getting away from the run too quickly would also be bad gameplanning.
I'm convinced winning requires the following, in order:
1) Game plan
2) Attitude
3) Coaching/Training
4) Execution
5) Talent
The upsets of this season have shown that lesser talented teams can win. I think those games can be attributed to having the top 4 things in order. Relying on talent alone won't win games.
what exactly does a game in 2001 and 2004 have to do with today?