K
knute
Guest
I've probably beat this to death already, but I can't get it out of my head. It makes a lot of sense from the New England, unconventional, get-the-best-players-on-the-field, exploit mismatches point of view.
Normally, when a team trots out 3 TEs or 2 TEs and a FB/HB, the defense is expecting a power running play. But the rub is that ND can do this with a speed-burner TE in Ragone, a speed burner RB in Allen and three great receivers in Carlson, Reuland and Grimes.
How do you defend that? With that many great, fast receivers you want your nickel package in. Most DBs are going to be too small to cover NDs TEs and most LBs are going to be too slow and weak in coverage. And you still have the option of making it a running play with three extra big blockers.
I have no idea if this really makes sense, but it wouldn't surprise me and I'd be excited to see how it works.
Normally, when a team trots out 3 TEs or 2 TEs and a FB/HB, the defense is expecting a power running play. But the rub is that ND can do this with a speed-burner TE in Ragone, a speed burner RB in Allen and three great receivers in Carlson, Reuland and Grimes.
How do you defend that? With that many great, fast receivers you want your nickel package in. Most DBs are going to be too small to cover NDs TEs and most LBs are going to be too slow and weak in coverage. And you still have the option of making it a running play with three extra big blockers.
I have no idea if this really makes sense, but it wouldn't surprise me and I'd be excited to see how it works.
