Does UCLA have more talent on defense?

G

goldenechoes

Guest
I dont think so. So what is the reason they are a top 10 defense?
 

SillyIrish

New member
Messages
1,020
Reaction score
22
Does UCLA have more talent on defense?

I dont think so. So what is the reason they are a top 10 defense?

As opposed to who, they are sure doing a good job of shutting down SC unlike we did last week.
 
G

goldenechoes

Guest
UCLA brings in DeWayne Walker from the Redskins and BAM, they are a top 10 defense.
 

LOVEMYIRISH

old timer
Messages
5,125
Reaction score
409
I dont think so. So what is the reason they are a top 10 defense?

they must have the TRUE talent because those guys have a superior pass rush to most teams... I don't care what those kids were rated...they rush the passer like animals uncaged. They had a better front 4 than USC...even compared to when we played USC.
 
R

rontdtarchala

Guest
and I got chastized for being negative last week...speed kills and ucla bitch slapped usc all game...we need speed and we need a real dc now!!!!!
 

LOVEMYIRISH

old timer
Messages
5,125
Reaction score
409
and I got chastized for being negative last week...speed kills and ucla bitch slapped usc all game...we need speed and we need a real dc now!!!!!

A DC will not get our Front 4 to be faster. They work on sprinting drills all the time... Our guys are just not fast enough on the pass rush. They are lumbering...despite the fact that they work on speed all the time.

We need faster guys. And Weis will get them.
 

lattedatte

New member
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
18
talent when? out of high school or now?

out of high school - advantage ND.
now - advantage UCLA.
 
K

KOWPOKE

Guest
UCLA's depth and talent on defensive front four are both head and shoulders above our's - not even close (I doubt Frome would be 2nd team for them)
 
N

nbogan1

Guest
i thought frome was ranked pretty high coming out of high school
 

Clotho

Banned
Messages
396
Reaction score
11
Exactly. They're more talented than our guys now, but weren't out of high school. WHY is that? What is the difference?
 

brecht

New member
Messages
71
Reaction score
1
i think it boils down to simplicity. if you tell your line, do nothing but get at the passer, that's pretty clear. it's much easier to execute when you limit responsibility. michigan did the same thing this year, they simplified their defense. took responsibilities away from players, and their production went through the roof.

i don't know if NDs defense is overly complex or not. but they sure do seem to miss responsibilities. especially with new faces next year on d, i'd expect the scheme to be simpler. hopefully we'll see improvement too.
 
G

goldenechoes

Guest
i think it boils down to simplicity. if you tell your line, do nothing but get at the passer, that's pretty clear. it's much easier to execute when you limit responsibility. michigan did the same thing this year, they simplified their defense. took responsibilities away from players, and their production went through the roof.

i don't know if NDs defense is overly complex or not. but they sure do seem to miss responsibilities. especially with new faces next year on d, i'd expect the scheme to be simpler. hopefully we'll see improvement too.

When you have recruits commenting that NDs defense is so overly complicated that it doesnt work, you know there is a problem.
 

lattedatte

New member
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
18
Exactly. They're more talented than our guys now, but weren't out of high school. WHY is that? What is the difference?

Hard to tell, really Clotho it is, I'm sure you think it is coaching and that could be. But it could also be that Hickman and Co. was underated coming out of high school, or they were late bloomers or they worked their ass off in the weight room and field. There are to many cases when the latter was the case to just say coaching.
 
Messages
1,276
Reaction score
32
idk, they fared pretty damn well against our offense and against USC's..... so, I'd say the answer is "yes".

They did too well in their games compared to our defense for it to all be credited to their coaching.
 

Seymore

New member
Messages
229
Reaction score
12
UCLA has some kickass DEs' ! When your bringing that much speed from both sides all game, it's gonna be tough for QBs'. Couple that with a non-complicated scheme and good discipline,,,, and wa-lah !
 
N

nbogan1

Guest
hopefully we continue to improve in getting better defensive recruits and either minter does a better job at DC or we get someone who can develop players and have a scheme to where our players arent out of position
 

Clotho

Banned
Messages
396
Reaction score
11
idk, they fared pretty damn well against our offense and against USC's..... so, I'd say the answer is "yes".

They did too well in their games compared to our defense for it to all be credited to their coaching.


I don't think you understand. Coaching isn't just gameday scheming, it's intensive and goes on all through each player's career. It goes on in practice. It goes on in film study. It goes on on the sidelines. It's all the time. These players have had better coaching than our players have had on defense. Add to that a better defensive scheme, and voila- they're head and shoulders above us.
 

littlerick77

New member
Messages
245
Reaction score
28
Definitely coaching is key to their strong D. Speed and natural abilities are part of it too, but coaching is the intangible. Look how much better Brady got with CW.

I want a coach like Ken Norton (not him, just someone with his style) at SC.......you see how he gets his guys fired up on the sidelines?? I never see ND's linebacker coach on the sideline getting the boys ready like that!
 

lattedatte

New member
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
18
Definitely coaching is key to their strong D. Speed and natural abilities are part of it too, but coaching is the intangible. Look how much better Brady got with CW.

I want a coach like Ken Norton (not him, just someone with his style) at SC.......you see how he gets his guys fired up on the sidelines?? I never see ND's linebacker coach on the sideline getting the boys ready like that!

It couldn't be totally coaching, UCLA gave up 66 to SC last year with pretty much the same coaches.....
 
R

rontdtarchala

Guest
its coaching its coaching its fricken coaching...kids only become monsters by bad parenting...players only become average by bad coaching....
 

littlerick77

New member
Messages
245
Reaction score
28
I didn't say it was all coaching.......

Also, it was the same D and coaches (as you say) - but SC had the heisman duo, so this years offense wasn't the same offense that put on 66 last year.
 
Top