Honestly, I like Mandel. I think his approach to rankings is as good as there is. He doesn't unreasonably rank WVU ahead of Louisville two weeks post defeat like a lot of voters is one example. And I think he tries to rank teams as to how they're playing currently, which is how it should be done. Is his ranking of notre dame fair? probably not. but the only team that jumped ND this week in his mind was rutgers, and understandably so. plus, notre dame, for the last month or so, ND has beat nothing but inferior competition, which usually doesn't do much towards impressing pundits. It doesn't impress them to the point where they're comfortable moving ND up around the 5 spot after ND made all those preseason predictors look stupid earlier in the year when they played michigan. One last thing, and he even points this out, is that his rankings mean NOTHING. no point in getting worked up over it, as long as ND plays well for the rest of the season, they'll be ranked where they deserve to be. And mandel still has the irish playing in the bcs in his predictions, which makes me think that his 3 TD loss to USC comment is just blowhard. Even haters like him know it will be a good game.