imagine what will be said if we do go to the gator bowl nd wold be smeared no matter win or lose .
Some ND fans yes, others think ND will beat the Colts and can do no wrong. Who is right or wrong?
Theres a difference in being "scared" to play a true top 5 team in a bowl and knowing what your teams limitations are. IMO the fan that thinks ND can do no wrong is by far the wrong of the two.
Nothing wrong in admitting the team has too many weak spots to hang with a top 5 team THIS YEAR. But there is something wrong with ignoring the weak points and thinking we can do no wrong.
Which right now is Ohio St. and Michigan. Quit attributing Florida as having a great O.But if you win or not depends on your D!!!! We will not win against a team with a great O and a great D.
POOR teams dont go to bowl games, there is an actual winning record requirement. And is ND above playing a #18 team in a bowl game? Last I checked UCLA was unranked but almost beat us. Not to mention others.
Um. Did you miss the fact that one of those teams is no longer undefeated and is now ranked behind ND? I find it funny that you make the must have a great D argument in the same thread in which you give those two teams credit for earning their record with high powered offense.Yeah but at least those are two high powered Offenses that are undefeated.
Find one person here who thinks the Irish would beat the Colts. (As I told another poster, hyperbole will win you no arguments)
I'll admit a games against Ohio St. right now wouldn't look too good.
As for hanging with a "true" top 5 team, that depends on your definition of "true." Had Florida not blocked two Vanderbilt punts on Saturday, they would not be a "true" top 10 team today.
Yes, we see ND's faults. There are weak points. But outside of Ohio St. and maybe Michigan, there are not teams out there without faults.
But go ahead and cower in fear.
Some ND fans yes, others think ND will beat the Colts and can do no wrong. Who is right or wrong?
Theres a difference in being "scared" to play a true top 5 team in a bowl and knowing what your teams limitations are. IMO the fan that thinks ND can do no wrong is by far the wrong of the two.
Nothing wrong in admitting the team has too many weak spots to hang with a top 5 team THIS YEAR. But there is something wrong with ignoring the weak points and thinking we can do no wrong.
So.....that Florida team that you are afraid of almost lost to an unranked Vanderbilt over the weekend. And did you see the teams that Ohio St. and Michigan were lucky to escape against? I'm not saying we are OSU or UM right now, but you can't count close wins as losses as you seem to be doing.
bullshit half the bowl games are poor teams if you go bye your thinking bmf
Nobody is arguing against that. But at 8-1, it's obvioulsy good enough to win some games when coupled with the offense. As is Florida's bad offense when coupled with their defense.Playing OSU RIGHT NOW wouldnt look good? We are 3/4ths done with the season. And our D is still questionable,
Nobody has argued this either. But again, they win way more often than they lose. Why? Because more often than not, the offense DOES show up.Dont you get it? This is our team, these are our weaknesses. If they have not changed this far into the season they are not going to change.
The gist of my argument is not that we can beat a superior team, it's what constitutes a superior team. My cower in fear comments have been against those who are so sure the Irish would get rolled by a team like Florida. My contention is that they are NOT a superior team. Superior D? Yes. Superior O? Not by a long shot. Just like ND, they have played some close ones against lesser competition and have had some breaks to get to where they are.The only thing that can change is the intensity of the players and even then they can only play up their talent level, which for the D is not as HIGH as it needs to be to beat a superior team.
I don't give a damn what you use when arguing against others. But I'm not big on hyperbole as an argument and I certainly won't be swayed by it.Who cares what you have said to another poster? So all of a sudden you set rules for arguments?!?
Going 11-1 WOULD be a good reason to play a high ranked team in a bowl. Wins are wins. Losses are losses. I can't remember the last team that went through a season without losing or winning some games closer than they should. But the wins still counted for them. Why don't they count for Notre Dame?And you also cant count close wins against "inferior opponents" a good reason why we should play Florida or any other higher ranked team in a BCS bowl (as you seem to be doing).
OK. Since you're thanking him, find me one poster on this board who doesn't think ND has some faults or who thinks ND could beat one of the elite teams in the NFL.Thank You
If you're trying to sound intelligent while making a point...yes.
And I think an argument could be made that a fair number of poor teams go to bowls, what with the number of games that are played after the reg season.
Last I checked, they don't award wins for almost beating the other team.
OK. Since you're thanking him, find me one poster on this board who doesn't think ND has some faults or who thinks ND could beat one of the elite teams in the NFL.
Find me such a post. Take a day or two. Please report back to us.
OK. Let's start here. Did we learn anything when Vandy almost beat Florida? Yep. That UF can be beat. Is Vandy better than ND? Works both ways, doesn't it?Did we learn something when Zook's boys almost beat OSU? Yep. That OSU can be beat.
Once again, hyperbole. Notre Dame has played 9 teams. They lost to one. They "almost" lost to two others. MSU and UCLA. You might argue Georgia Tech, but ND was in control from the end of the first half on. Maybe not in the score, but they were moving the ball from then on and GT wasn't. And that's more than some other good teams can say about their games with GT. Nobody else has come within two touchdowns of ND. So where do you get this overrated because they almost lost to half the teams?Have we learned something from ND "almost" lossing to half the teams they played? Yep, we are over rated. Hell I can admit it others on the board can admit it. No shame in it.
Thank You
I'm not the only one posting in this thread. You seem to be going with your side. When I see something I believe to be false, I try to provide evidence to the contrary.Man, calm down you're getting carried away. Its OK if people disagree with you. Obviously some things escape you.
Damn...there's barely any difference between us Cal and U. of Spoiled Children according to the BCS average.
Irish- .732
Cal- .733
Spoiled Children- .745
That's the difference between 7th and 9th...
Going 11-1 WOULD be a good reason to play a high ranked team in a bowl. Wins are wins. Losses are losses. I can't remember the last team that went through a season without losing or winning some games closer than they should. But the wins still counted for them. Why don't they count for Notre Dame?
Miami's last title team was probably it. Followed by an OSU team that won a title with a lot of breaks, including a Cincinnati WR dropping a touchdown in the end zone that would have put OSU simply in the Rose Bowl and out of the title game. A lucky win against an inferior team. Yet it still seemed to count? Hmmm.
Im not arguing that.
I think ND is great, everybody on here has been an ND fan for a long time. Everybody wishes ND the best. And who ever they play I WANT them to win, hell I will more than likely be in the stands, even if I think it is a bad match up.
You talk about hyperbole, I dont recall anybody saying we should only play a suck ass team in a bowl. The only thing some of us are saying is that we dont think we are good enough this year to compete with some teams....thats it.
Nobody is "scared". Why would they be we are not on the field!
Some people think we are too "superior" of a team and school to lower ourselves to play the Broncos or Rutgers? Why? You guys make a big deal about being 8-1 last I checked they have a better record than us. Just because we dont play UF or UM or OSU doesnt mean they disrespecting the ND.
OK. Let's start here. Did we learn anything when Vandy almost beat Florida? Yep. That UF can be beat. Is Vandy better than ND? Works both ways, doesn't it?
Once again, hyperbole. Notre Dame has played 9 teams. They lost to one. They "almost" lost to two others. MSU and UCLA. You might argue Georgia Tech, but ND was in control from the end of the first half on. Maybe not in the score, but they were moving the ball from then on and GT wasn't. And that's more than some other good teams can say about their games with GT. Nobody else has come within two touchdowns of ND. So where do you get this overrated because they almost lost to half the teams?
Now I'm convinced you're trolling.
Nope. Nobody I know. I tend to think my posts are quite useful, thank you.Trolling? What the fuck are you talking about? I cant be trolling if some people agree with me. Ive been apart of this forum for as long as you but I have far less useless postings than some people.
A forum troll not only causes trouble but has thousands of useless posts. Sound like anybody YOU know?
Nope. Nobody I know. I tend to think my posts are quite useful, thank you.
It wasn't a correction of grammar to begin with...but of course you knew that.No it only matters if you are a petty person that thinks grammar corrections are even remotely important in a forum.
So you're saying there's no difference between a BCS eligible team and those who fill out the "lesser" bowls?Ok any team they put against a one loss ND team is not going to be "poor" the whole point to playing in a bowl is money. No body is going to go to a ND v. SDSU bowl game. Just because we dont play a team in the top five does not means that we will not play another good team.
I don't think so....no one outside of the top 2 have really distanced themselves. OSU beat Texas....Michigan beat....well, I don't know who they beat since you consider ND overrated. Where is their marquee win that justifies the #2 spot?Yep, we are over rated. Hell I can admit it others on the board can admit it. No shame in it.
It wasn't a correction of grammar to begin with...but of course you knew that.
Play the best available and risk the loss verus playing an average team that we should beat.
I don't think so....no one outside of the top 2 have really distanced themselves. OSU beat Texas....Michigan beat....well, I don't know who they beat since you consider ND overrated. Where is their marquee win that justifies the #2 spot?