This team ND team is better than both those ND teams. This USC team is probably similar to those USC teams, but without an advantage at the skill positions against our secondary. We’ve flipped the script with our secondary now being a strength.i’m expecting a 2012/2018 type of game. where it is a little too close for comfort throughout and we trail at times but end up winning 24-17 or 24-20
I think we need some type of pass rush, and that might be difficult without Cross. Few days til we find out.This team ND team is better than both those ND teams. This USC team is probably similar to those USC teams, but without an advantage at the skill positions against our secondary. We’ve flipped the script with our secondary now being a strength.
They did lose to Minnesota though?They should have lost to Minny, but PJ is, somehow, a bigger bitch than LR.
Yes, they didThey did lose to Minnesota though?
Marks is good w/ the ball in his hands whether it be via handoff or pass. I believe he leads the team in receptions. I watched their game last Saturday vs UCLA but neither team looked very good so I’ll throw that out. I could be wrong, but I’d put this SC team as the 2nd best opponent ND faces on their schedule this season. I have them equal to UL but playing in LA & being a rivalry game gives them the edge over UL as an opponent.Funny thing is the most striking thing I see in watching USC is how different they are from last year. Last year they couldn’t stop a sneeze and their OL was a revolving door but with Caleb Williams they put points on the board with a lot of explosive plays. This year the D has improved a lot and the OL is competant but they don’t excel at anything important. Their RB, Marks is damn good but Riley would rather pass. QB is OK, not great by any means. Defense is pretty sound but doesn’t make a lot of negative plays so you can move the ball on them .
Not a blowout but we should take care of business in a workmanlike fashion. Very untypical USC. Feels like a road game vs a middling ACC team.
Yep, gotta stop Marks first! He’s had 192 carries 1,100 yards 9TDs this year. Plus, 47 receptions. He is the workhorse!Marks is good w/ the ball in his hands whether it be via handoff or pass. I believe he leads the team in receptions. I watched their game last Saturday vs UCLA but neither team looked very good so I’ll throw that out. I could be wrong, but I’d put this SC team as the 2nd best opponent ND faces on their schedule this season. I have them equal to UL but playing in LA & being a rivalry game gives them the edge over UL as an opponent.
I think Louisville when we played them was a little better but adjusted for location USC and Louisville are pretty equal .Marks is good w/ the ball in his hands whether it be via handoff or pass. I believe he leads the team in receptions. I watched their game last Saturday vs UCLA but neither team looked very good so I’ll throw that out. I could be wrong, but I’d put this SC team as the 2nd best opponent ND faces on their schedule this season. I have them equal to UL but playing in LA & being a rivalry game gives them the edge over UL as an opponent.
Hope that‘s the case along w/ Tim Prister‘s belief in that Freeman has this team singularly focused on winning this game. Anything can happen in an end of season rivalry game. I don’t care that MF & this team had zero to do w/ previous close calls or losses in LA. Look at 6-6 Auburn last year vs a Bama team that made the CFP. Despite Bama having the GOAT at HC, it wasn’t enough to prevent a middling Auburn team from almost ruining their season.I think Louisville when we played them was a little better but adjusted for location USC and Louisville are pretty equal .
We’re better because Riley is better so if that continues we should prevail
It's true, but Alabama did that a lot last year. They had more than a few close calls against really mediocre/bad teams.Hope that‘s the case along w/ Tim Prister‘s belief in that Freeman has this team singularly focused on winning this game. Anything can happen in an end of season rivalry game. I don’t care that MF & this team had zero to do w/ previous close calls or losses in LA. Look at 6-6 Auburn last year vs a Bama team that made the CFP. Despite Bama having the GOAT at HC, it wasn’t enough to prevent a middling Auburn team from almost ruining their season.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
USC getting credit for playing close games against *checks notes* 7-4 LSU, 6-5 Michigan, 6-5 Michigan, 4-7 Maryland, 6-5 Washington, 6-5 Nebraska, and 4-7 UCLA won’t stop being funny to me.Before, I thought Pate gave some pretty fair analysis.
Not sure where he basing this take other than SC having nothing to lose... the fact that ND might struggle in a close game since they've rolled everyone after wk2 and SC won't because that's how they play every game?? GTFO with that trash take.
Keeping this receipt.
Josh Pate also picked Texas A&M over ND. Just saying
That was Joel Klatt. I had the same thought.Didn't he pick Navy too?
Yeah he’s an idiot (like all of them). He has a model but sometimes picks against it. Then what’s the point of the model?He's been super against the Irish all year even though his model had us way higher than he ranked us.