Yeah I don’t see how this ploy by BC ends up with them getting him back. So what best case scenario he goes to an unknown third school. Maybe that’s a little win for BC but I suppose their would be ways to fuck them too and why do they want to go tit for tat with a lion when they are a civet cat at bestEveryone on the ND side is sticking to this being an unofficial and BC side an official.
From the ND side, I guess the reason to cover for Traore may be that they don’t want it public that someone violated their “policy”
From the BC side, there has been a suggestion that they could be pushing the OV reporting in hopes to elicit a negative response from ND which would be pretty fucked up recruiting moves.
He showed up and gave them the opportunitySinger just went on record saying he thinks it’s possible BC pushed the OV thing to create tension between ND & Traore and it was “a turd move.”
There is a difference though. Maybe Traore got the green light from our staff to take an unofficial to BC with friends, he shows up, and then Hafley--fully aware of our policy about no OVs for commits--decides to mischaracterize the visit as an "official" in the hopes of sowing discord between ND and one of the few elite recruits he's got a shot at?He showed up and gave them the opportunity
He lives in Boston. He went with friends BC is recruiting. He was committed to BC for a year and a half and if he wanted to go there he'd still be committed.He showed up and gave them the opportunity
Inferiority complex. They know they're "Backup College."Is there some type of rule or do they include it in the contract at BC that says every FB coach at BC is required to have a hard-on for ND? Leahy was over 50 years ago. Get over it.
Just saying he gave them the opportunity. And I put about zero respect on our no visit policy with the way other recruitments have played out.There is a difference though. Maybe Traore got the green light from our staff to take an unofficial to BC with friends, he shows up, and then Hafley--fully aware of our policy about no OVs for commits--decides to mischaracterize the visit as an "official" in the hopes of sowing discord between ND and one of the few elite recruits he's got a shot at?
hahahaah I HIGHLY DOUBT anyoneeeee at B.C gives a damn about an ND coach over 50 years ago lololIs there some type of rule or do they include it in the contract at BC that says every FB coach at BC is required to have a hard-on for ND? Leahy was over 50 years ago. Get over it.
I assume the goal was to make ND overreact to fake news, thereby potentially driving a wedge between us and Traore.I'm not sure how it would help BC by spreading that misinformation. Yeah maybe it creates a crack in the relationship with ND. But doesn't it blow up the relationship with BC entirely if it becomes clear that BC is lying about the visit?
I don’t think BC is lying.I'm not sure how it would help BC by spreading that misinformation. Yeah maybe it creates a crack in the relationship with ND. But doesn't it blow up the relationship with BC entirely if it becomes clear that BC is lying about the visit?