| |||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Welcome to IrishEnvy.com! Founded in September of 2004, IrishEnvy.com has grown into the premiere web portal on the Internet for mature and intelligent Notre Dame Fighting Irish athletics discussion! You are currently viewing our boards as a Guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our FREE online community, you will have access to post and respond to discussions, communicate privately with other members, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely FREE, so join the IrishEnvy.com Community today! If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact support and we will assist you. If you already have an IrishEnvy.com membership account but forgot the username and/or password, use our password recovery tool to access your account information. |
| View Poll Results: Who will you vote for in the Presidential race? | |||
| Obama | | 122 | 38.98% |
| Romney | | 161 | 51.44% |
| Other | | 30 | 9.58% |
| Voters: 313. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #883 (permalink) | |
| Junior Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,620
Cash: 347,987.09Bank: 0.00 Total Bankroll: 347,987.09 Donate ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
So sorry for your daughter's friend. That is pure tragedy. Her parent's must be going through hell right now. The connection you make is very similar to the one that Pope Paul VI makes in his 1968 encyclical Humana Vitae. However, his view is not taken seriously outside of the Church because he taught that one of the majors roots that causes the abuse and objectification was birth control. Why, because the Church, as well as natural law, demonstrates an "inseparable connection, established by God, which man on his own initiative may not break, between the unitive significance and the procreative significance which are both inherent to the marriage act." All that means is that you can't separate sexulaity (in general) from procreation (in general). Once sexual gratification is seen as an end unto itself, rather than part of the larger procreatice act, then certain consequences follow (just as its is wonderful to enjoy good food, but if we separate gratification of our hunger apart from nourishment we eat junk, get fat, and lose our health). The biggest consequences are: 1) Loss of respect for women ("a man who grows accustomed to the use of contraceptive methods may forget the reverence due to a woman, and, disregarding her physical and emotional equilibrium, reduce her to being a mere instrument for the satisfaction of his own desires, no longer considering her as his partner whom he should surround with care and affection.") 2) Lowering of moral standards ("Not much experience is needed to be fully aware of human weakness and to understand that human beings—and especially the young, who are so exposed to temptation—need incentives to keep the moral law, and it is an evil thing to make it easy for them to break that law.") 3) Abuse of power (one child policy, third world sterilizations, sexualied sex-ed, etc.) The Pope is not talking about consequences that would flow from one act of contraception, but the concequences that flow from the changed attitude about sexuality that come with the embrace of the technique. Other consequences include: - the wholesale recasting of irresponsible, destructive behavior would be as healthy and responsible (i.e., random sex is "responsible" so long as protection is used). - Reconcieving of the body as something we own that we can manipulate as we please for our won ends (sterilization, masturbation, etc.) But as you alluded to, the Pope's asking people (1) not to engage in premarial sex, (2) not to use birth control and control themselves within their marriage, and even (3) asking them to not kill their children in utero, is considered tantamount to "forcing them" to have tons of kids. Its also been blamed for the AIDS crisis, hatred against homosexuals, etc. So I am certainly not expecting anyone to be convinced, I just thought it was an interesting connection. In fact, some might argue that the abuse of children is just an unfortunate biproduct of the fact that we finally have more access to sex. Just as a lot of crime occurs because of alcohol (but prohibition was a lousy idea and people should be able to get drunk if they want) and lots of murders happen with guns (thoughthat is certainly not the fault of law abiding gun owners), some kids are going to get hur by our new freedomst, but most, on the whole are better off. To me, all this has nothign to do with whether abortion is murder, though. Either the child is a human being, and its murder, or she is not. If she isn't, our current situation is exceptable, if she is, than its wrong. Last edited by Domina Nostra; 08-24-2012 at 10:14 AM.. | |
| | |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | |
| | #884 (permalink) |
| Guest | I understand what you are saying. I have read your post it is awesome. I am with you on all but one aspect. I don't want to get into biology or humanism or catholicism. And I don't mean to be disrespectful. A problem I have had with Catholicism for a while now is it leads to assumptions, because we are human. I think there was one small assumption in what you explained that causes the entire difference with what I was trying to express and you so aptly put. I think you can enjoy food, even if you are not hungry, it is just that a more stringent set of rules of conduct apply. If I go to a banquet or reception, and I am not truly, hungry, I can partake, but I have to be responsible not to be a pig, to go to the gymn, and not to take the food out of others mouths' as I have had my fill. |
|
| | #885 (permalink) |
| Freshman Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: California
Posts: 773
Cash: 1,006,763.82Bank: 11,424.08 Total Bankroll: 1,018,187.90 Donate ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Bogs that is a sad story. Not to be trite but I've had enough of this abortion stuff. Anybody see that the GOP is using the "we built this" theme in a convention center built using largely public funds? Oh sweet irony. Maybe they should've just had the convention in Sheldon Adelson's backyard. Let's go Golson! Last edited by Bluto; 08-24-2012 at 10:45 AM.. |
| | |
| | #886 (permalink) | |
| Keyser Söze Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,614
Cash: 15,612.52Bank: 2,248,318,222.32 Total Bankroll: 2,248,333,834.84 Donate ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
__________________ | |
| | |
| | #887 (permalink) |
| Freshman Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: California
Posts: 773
Cash: 1,006,763.82Bank: 11,424.08 Total Bankroll: 1,018,187.90 Donate ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | That's hilarious. Actually, I went to the after party of the California GOP Convention. It was kind of strange. Half to a third of the people were in a prayer circle. The rest were getting blotto and daring these two hot chicks to make out with each other. One guy (mid twenties I'm guessing) was dressed just like Waldo from Where's Waldo. The point being they would trample your plants but then they would pray for them. |
| | |
| | #888 (permalink) |
| Catholics vs. Cousins Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 1,226
Cash: 183,591.67Bank: 1,263,047.65 Total Bankroll: 1,446,639.32 Donate ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Bluto - Republicans can claim just as much of the mess that was built as Democrats. Republicans have largely built - 1) the military industrial complex 2) The fiscal cliff (by not making the Bush cuts permanent in the first place) 3) Housing bubble arm in arm with democrats 4) Expanded Medicare we couldn't afford 5) Expanded Federal influence in education with No Child Left Behind rather than eliminating the department of Education 6) Generally spent like drunken sailors (albeit less drunk than democrat sailors) Oh, I know it is a reference to government deserving credit for making roads and bridges and discovering the internet. Last I checked though, tax payer funds paid for all the above (except for the $16 trillion borrowed). Taxpayers consist mostly of rich people and tax dollars are disproportionately paid by the upper 1%. Obama is not afraid to bite the hand that feeds the country (metaphorically) and expects this to somehow translate to the most productive choosing to be more productive and not take their business elsewhere. Conversely, the Republican theme is trying to respect the hand that feeds the country and theoretically do something to encourage more domestic production leading to more jobs and income to tax. (you may call this "giving" in to rich people) Make a behavior less expensive and you will get more of it. Whether that is murder or manufacturing, make it easier to do and you will get more of it. |
| | |
| | #889 (permalink) | |
| Keyser Söze Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,614
Cash: 15,612.52Bank: 2,248,318,222.32 Total Bankroll: 2,248,333,834.84 Donate ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
__________________ | |
| | |