- Messages
- 30,265
- Reaction score
- 73
Wooo! The two-pointer as viewed from the student section:
More postgame revelry captured by camera phones can be found at WCBN. Michigan Football Saturdays has a convenient roundup of the various informational links.
Meanwhile? celebratory posts abound:
The HSR says [obligatory "rock band" guitar miming] "don't stop believin'." [/miming] Some unruly Wisconsin fans are called out. (FWIW, the ones in our section were all fine except one guy who stood up for almost everything.) The WLA has two separate reaction pieces. GSimmons has an excellent post from his perspective as a coach. Varsity Blue has some bullets. In the Diaries there's an? uh? running diary from wolverine32, a simple declaration that Chrisgocomment loves Michigan football, a Saturday relived, and Lordfoul's recap. Uh? and a seriously serious suggestion (we're from serious) that we hire Kirk Ferentz. Sample the bounty of the internet and laugh contemptuously the next time someone pines for the old days when we'd get Mitch Albom's column and that's it.
BTW, the winner of last week's Awesome Diary = T Shirt Contest was, unsurprisingly, drexel, who got his Wisconsin scouting report bumped to the front page. May I suggest now is the time to get your Bow Down, Little Brother shirt? Or Zoltan For Space Emperor? Topical!
I loled. Cute kids watching the first half of the Wisconsin game, and then a punch line:
That man wins the dry sarcasm award of the week.
We're what? Whenever I post anything about lines four people correct me, but it's worth trying again:
10/04 3:30 PM http://www.vegasinsider.com/college-football/odds/las-vegas/?s=480 349 Illinois * 350 Michigan -1.0
That's the opening line from LVSC. Michigan is? favored? Elsewhere I've seen Michigan ?2 and Michigan ?2.5, which? wow. I know Illinois has been seivetastic on defense this year and squeaked by a Sun Belt team by three but I have also watched Michigan this year.
Eeee? I was all ready to fire up the Barwis bandwagon once again in the wake of this quote from Brandon Minor?
At least there's that. Apparently there was no replay of the critical roughing the passer penalty that turned fourth and fifteen into a first down and eventually a touchdown, but someone on the Wisconsin board has a set of images that appear to show it was a good call. FWIW.
Numberin'. Reader Alton provides a link to a mathematical breakdown of two point conversions by lead and time remaining. The data in the cells is what percentage chance you must exceed to make two points the best choice.
The slot for up one with twelve minutes left: 28%. The slot for nine minutes left: 21%. For about 10:30, then, it's reasonable to assume it was the right call if Michigan had a 25% chance to punch it in.
Another reader objects, saying that chart makes an awful lot of assumptions and can't be taken as gospel, and he's right, but I think the assumptions the chart makes?like the offenses in question are NFL-average ones versus NFL-average defenses?actually bias the chart in such a way that they overstate the necessary percentage for the call to be a good idea. This was not a close decision.
Etc.: Good stuff from Football Outsiders that's close to what my idea of a better set of college football statistics would be.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/mgoblog?a=vpJoXf
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/mgoblog?a=fjIZL http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/mgoblog?a=QiY8L
Link To Original Article
More postgame revelry captured by camera phones can be found at WCBN. Michigan Football Saturdays has a convenient roundup of the various informational links.
Meanwhile? celebratory posts abound:
The HSR says [obligatory "rock band" guitar miming] "don't stop believin'." [/miming] Some unruly Wisconsin fans are called out. (FWIW, the ones in our section were all fine except one guy who stood up for almost everything.) The WLA has two separate reaction pieces. GSimmons has an excellent post from his perspective as a coach. Varsity Blue has some bullets. In the Diaries there's an? uh? running diary from wolverine32, a simple declaration that Chrisgocomment loves Michigan football, a Saturday relived, and Lordfoul's recap. Uh? and a seriously serious suggestion (we're from serious) that we hire Kirk Ferentz. Sample the bounty of the internet and laugh contemptuously the next time someone pines for the old days when we'd get Mitch Albom's column and that's it.
BTW, the winner of last week's Awesome Diary = T Shirt Contest was, unsurprisingly, drexel, who got his Wisconsin scouting report bumped to the front page. May I suggest now is the time to get your Bow Down, Little Brother shirt? Or Zoltan For Space Emperor? Topical!
I loled. Cute kids watching the first half of the Wisconsin game, and then a punch line:
That man wins the dry sarcasm award of the week.
We're what? Whenever I post anything about lines four people correct me, but it's worth trying again:
10/04 3:30 PM http://www.vegasinsider.com/college-football/odds/las-vegas/?s=480 349 Illinois * 350 Michigan -1.0
That's the opening line from LVSC. Michigan is? favored? Elsewhere I've seen Michigan ?2 and Michigan ?2.5, which? wow. I know Illinois has been seivetastic on defense this year and squeaked by a Sun Belt team by three but I have also watched Michigan this year.
Eeee? I was all ready to fire up the Barwis bandwagon once again in the wake of this quote from Brandon Minor?
"There was one play and I ran down the field for an incompletion, and the linebacker that was chasing me, he was out of breath," Wolverines running back Brandon Minor said. "I came back a couple more plays and then scored. I still wasn't tired till my team beat me up on the sideline."
?but, uh? Minor's final line for the game: two carries for 35 yards and one catch for 11. He was in considerably more than he had been the past few games, but this does not exactly seem like a miraculous workload.
At least there's that. Apparently there was no replay of the critical roughing the passer penalty that turned fourth and fifteen into a first down and eventually a touchdown, but someone on the Wisconsin board has a set of images that appear to show it was a good call. FWIW.
Numberin'. Reader Alton provides a link to a mathematical breakdown of two point conversions by lead and time remaining. The data in the cells is what percentage chance you must exceed to make two points the best choice.
The slot for up one with twelve minutes left: 28%. The slot for nine minutes left: 21%. For about 10:30, then, it's reasonable to assume it was the right call if Michigan had a 25% chance to punch it in.
Another reader objects, saying that chart makes an awful lot of assumptions and can't be taken as gospel, and he's right, but I think the assumptions the chart makes?like the offenses in question are NFL-average ones versus NFL-average defenses?actually bias the chart in such a way that they overstate the necessary percentage for the call to be a good idea. This was not a close decision.
Etc.: Good stuff from Football Outsiders that's close to what my idea of a better set of college football statistics would be.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/mgoblog?a=vpJoXf
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/mgoblog?a=fjIZL http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/mgoblog?a=QiY8L
Link To Original Article