'08 GA DT Omar Hunter (Florida Verbal)

[Ricochet]

If Omar Hunter were to commit to ND there is no way ND will continue to recruit Marcus Forston. Newman, Hunter and Forston are NT and who know's what ND recruited Hafis Williams for? I like the kid alot especially as a 4-3 DT and I don't see him as a 3-4 DE and I'm not sure he's a NT and if he is then why is ND trying to get a 3rd NT in one class by still recruiting Hunter and Forston.

[Ricochet]

IMO Goebel isn't that effected by what Hunter does because I suspect that he will be a DE like Cwynar in the 3-4.

[Ricochet]

As I said if Hunter comes Forston gone and the player I would suspect that they would hold an offer for kike they would've for Forston is 3-4 DE Ethan Johnson.

[Irishknight1023]

Ricochet you could've put that in one reply not 3.

[irishunclebill]

Originally Posted by Ricochet

If Omar Hunter were to commit to ND there is no way ND will continue to recruit Marcus Forston. Newman, Hunter and Forston are NT and who know's what ND recruited Hafis Williams for? I like the kid alot especially as a 4-3 DT and I don't see him as a 3-4 DE and I'm not sure he's a NT and if he is then why is ND trying to get a 3rd NT in one class by still recruiting Hunter and Forston.

there is no way ND will continue to recruit Marcus Forston. I love the absolutes like you know for sure that if Hunter commits, that ND will not go after Forston. Did you talk to CW/CB about it. Also, the absolute that Forston is a NT. How about stating an opinion instead of trying to state that what you think are facts. Everybody has an opinion, and you know what they say about that. IMO, ND would not tell Forston he does not have an offer anymore if Hunter commits because he is too valuable of a recruiting commodity to just let go. IMO, Forston is not purely a NT, but capable of playing anywhere on the DL even in the 3-4, but those are just my opinions, I don't have the knowledge to state that will absolutely happen the way you did.

It is also my opinion that this discussion is all a moot point because Hunter will most likely (not absolutely) select Michigan.

[Ricochet]

Originally Posted by Irishknight1023

Ricochet you could've put that in one reply not 3.

I know but it was one of those things that I thought I was done with the post submitted already I guess in hindsight I could've went back and edit it but I didn't for whatever reason. My bad. Sorry.

[Ricochet]

Originally Posted by irishunclebill

there is no way ND will continue to recruit Marcus Forston. I love the absolutes like you know for sure that if Hunter commits, that ND will not go after Forston. Did you talk to CW/CB about it. Also, the absolute that Forston is a NT. How about stating an opinion instead of trying to state that what you think are facts. Everybody has an opinion, and you know what they say about that. IMO, ND would not tell Forston he does not have an offer anymore if Hunter commits because he is too valuable of a recruiting commodity to just let go. IMO, Forston is not purely a NT, but capable of playing anywhere on the DL even in the 3-4, but those are just my opinions, I don't have the knowledge to state that will absolutely happen the way you did.

It is also my opinion that this discussion is all a moot point because Hunter will most likely (not absolutely) select Michigan.

Of course not and I agree with what your saying in most cases because I would be saying the same thing but using common sense do you really see ND bringing in 3 to 4 NT in one class? I don't and thats why I made it out to be an absolute if Hunter comes to ND. I agree that it's most likely a moot point because it's most likely that Hunter commits to Michigan.