View Single Post
Old 02-17-2007, 04:25 AM   #17 (permalink)
BGIF
Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,178
Cash: 4,738.50
Bank: 0.00
Total Bankroll: 4,738.50
Donate
BGIF should be giving advice to Weis!BGIF should be giving advice to Weis!BGIF should be giving advice to Weis!BGIF should be giving advice to Weis!BGIF should be giving advice to Weis!BGIF should be giving advice to Weis!BGIF should be giving advice to Weis!BGIF should be giving advice to Weis!BGIF should be giving advice to Weis!BGIF should be giving advice to Weis!BGIF should be giving advice to Weis!

Quote:
Originally Posted by illinoisirish88 View Post
Even with geographic territories, the position coaches have been very involved in the recruitment of players for the positions they coach. The effort is a cooridnated team approach. Geographic guy does a portion of the footwork, position coach helps, and Charlie is the closer.
and ShivaIrish


I agree. I'm familiar with the "team" approach but my response wasn't meant to be a treatise on recruiting management. It was in response to a specific statement (which was quoted in my post) about a recruit playing a specific position because a defensive coach, CB, was listed as his recruiter.

Quote:
...Since CB is listed as his recruiter, ND obviously wants him to play DT. ...



I cited several examples where primary recruiters weren't designated by position but rather by territory as I believe is the case with Cave. Perhaps I should have followed the original poster's logic and noted, "Clausen and Dever obviously must be playing Special Teams and/or LB then as Polian was "listed" as their recruiter".
BGIF is offline   Reply With Quote